Social Work In Criminal Justice
This module will address the role of social work in the criminal justice context. This context includes a range of agencies working with adults and young persons who are involved in offending and agencies who work with the victims of crime.
Social Work within the criminal justice context can therefore involve direct work with people who have offended, for example working as a Probation Officer or working in a voluntary sector organisation that provide services to people involved in the criminal justice system. It also involves working with children and families who may be involved in the criminal justice system or affected by crime.
The module will cover the context and settings of social work in the criminal justice system, the principles, methods and interventions of working with offending behaviour; assessment in criminal justice contexts; the impact of crime and working with children and young people in the criminal justice system. A commitment to anti-oppressive practice underpins the module and students will be encouraged to critically think and evaluate their own practice and perspectives.
The module runs in Semester One and consists of lectures which take place on Tuesdays from 22/09/09 to 27/10/09. Lectures will be held from 10am to 1pm every Tuesday and on alternate weeks there will also be lectures from 2pm to 4pm in the afternoon. Tutorials will take place on alternate Fridays, beginning on 25/09/09. Students will be divided into tutorial groups and tutorials will run from 12-1pm and 1pm to 2pm on alternate Fridays. Students will be notified of their assigned tutor group in due course.
Students will be assessed for via a written assignment which is due for submission on:
Monday 2nd November at 4pm.
Module Aims
Students will understand the social work role within a criminal Justice context, and develop their understanding of the knowledge, skill and value base pertinent to the area of practice.
Learning Outcomes
Students will understand policy and legislation that informs the social work role in this context.
Students will learn the theoretical perspectives informing social work intervention in a criminal justice context.
Students will explore the research and methods that inform social work intervention in the criminal justice context.
Students will develop skills in the critical examination of theory and its application to practice.
Students will understand their own value base in relation to this area and have considered ethical issues in relation to practice.
Week 1 – Introduction to Social Work and Criminal Justice – history, context and settings
Date: 22/09/09
Lecture: 10 – 1pm – Nicola Carr
Tutorial – 25/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) – Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur
Week 2 – Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions
Date: 29/09/09
Lecture: 10am -1pm – Nicola Carr
Lecture: 2pm -4pm – Nicola Carr
Week 3 – Assessment in criminal justice contexts
Date: 06/10/09
Lecture: 10am – 1pm – Nicola Carr
Tutorial: 09/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) – Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur
Week 4 – The impact of offending – working with victims of crime and Restorative Justice approaches
Date: 13/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm – Nicola Carr
Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Victim Panel – Susan Reid, Victim Support, Northern Ireland and Christine Hunter, PBNI Victims Unit)
Week 5 – Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement
Date: 20/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm (PPNAI, Willie McAuley; John Warren, Extern)
Tutorial: 23/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2)
Week 6: Working with young people in the criminal justice system – balancing welfare and justice?
Date: 27/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm – Nicola Carr
Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Kelvin Doherty, Youth Justice Agency)
Course Reading
Recommended Texts
A further extensive list of recommended reading is provided for each week of the course based on subject area.
Assessment
Assessment of this module is through a written assignment which is due for submission:
Monday 2nd November by 4pm.
You are required to submit one printed copy to Reception in 6 College Park and one electronic copy via ‘My Modules’ on Queen’s Online before 4.00pm on Tues 5th Jan. Please refer to the following link on the School’s web site for submission procedures http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofSociologySocialPolicySocialWork/ImportantNotice/#d.en.93464
Students must answer one of the essay questions below and the word count for this assignment is: 2500 Words +/- 10%
Essay Questions
Restorative Justice aims to address the consequences of offending for victims and offenders and communities in a meaningful way. Critically evaluate this statement with reference to practice in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system.
Young people who are involved in offending should be treated as ‘children first’. Discuss this statement with reference to policy and practice in working with young people in the criminal justice system.
The history of probation is one of an increased emphasis on public protection. Discuss this statement with reference to probation practice in Northern Ireland.
Assessment of the risk of re-offending and risk of harm should guide the nature of intervention with offenders. Critically evaluate this statement with reference to theory, policy and practice.
GUIDELINES
This assignment should be based on learning from your lectures, workshops and guided study / reading .You are encouraged to start researching and preparing at an early stage as the submission date is A discussion forum will also be established on queens on-line in order to assist you to share ideas with tutors and other students and to seek to share resources for the assignment.
REFERENCING
Your assignment must be supported with references from relevant readings and you must follow the referencing guidelines relating to books, journals and web based material provided in your course handbook. You are encouraged to read widely in preparing for your assignment, drawing on material from your reading list as well as other relevant material. You should also look at the general assessment guidelines in your assessment handbook for more general assignment writing skills.
Essay guidance
The best way to structure the answer to a question is to begin with a very brief analysis of what you interpret the question as being about, and then a road-map of how you propose to answer it. This focuses your mind on organising a clear, coherent structure for your answer. Be very careful to indicate as much as possible of what empirical or other evidence there is to support your points.
It is not necessary to come to a definite conclusion on the question: uncertainty having weighed the arguments and evidence is almost always an acceptable position. What is essential, however, is that you have given sufficient weight to arguments contrary to your own, with reasons to back up your rejection. Frequently questions require you to present and assess a number of viewpoints, indicated by such instructions as ‘discuss’, ‘assess’, ‘how far is the case that…’ etc. But it is always essential to consider what alternative interpretations to your own argument there might be.
Source: Oxford University Press (Online Resource Centre)
Requirements for the Award of 10 Credit Points
In order to be awarded 10 credit points towards the completion of the Bachelor’s Degree in Social Work students must:
Complete and submit a written assignment and gain a mark of at least 40%.
Attend at least 80% of all lectures; and
Attend at least 80% of all workshops.
Students who fail to attend for the required number of lectures and tutorials, or who miss particularly crucial elements of the module, may be required to undertake additional work in order to be awarded credit points.
LATE SUBMISSION OF COURSEWORK
The University’s rule is that for work submitted after the deadline, 5 percentage points per working day are deducted from the received mark up to a maximum of five days. Thereafter, the work receives zero.
Extensions to essay deadlines are covered by a formal University procedure and may be granted on grounds of ill health or personal circumstances. You need to submit a completed Exemption from Late Coursework Marks Penalty Form (available from the Office, 6 College Park and on the School’s Website www.qub.ac.uk/soc ) within three days of the essay deadline. The form should be accompanied by a medical certificate (NOT self-certification) and/or other written supporting evidence and should be taken to the module convenor, preferably during his/her office hours, who decides whether or not to agree to an extension.
Lecture Outlines
Week 1 – Introduction to Social Work and Criminal Justice – history, context and settings
Date: 22/09/09
Lecture: 10 – 1pm
This lecture will provide an introduction to the module by outlining the role of social work in the criminal justice context. The first lecture will cover the history of social work within the criminal justice context and will explore theoretical perspectives on the intersection of social work and the criminal justice system. Particular consideration will be given to the role of the social worker within the parameters of the ‘care’ or ‘control’ debate. Some of the key phases of social work intervention in the criminal justice system will be explored ranging from original social work role as a ‘court missionary’ through to the current drive towards interventions based on the assessment of risk and ‘evidence based practice’.
Tutorial – 25/09/09 (Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2)
Following from the introductory lecture, this tutorial will focus on some of the key paradigm shifts that have influenced the role of social work within the criminal justice context. Students will be encouraged to critically explore the role of social work within this setting.
Key Reading – Social Work in the Criminal Justice System – History, Context and Settings
Audit Commission (1989) Promoting Value for Money in the Probation Service, London: HMSO
Brownlee, I. (1998) Community Punishment. A Critical Introduction. Essex: Longman Criminology Series
Burnett, R. & Roberts, C. (Ed.) (2004) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice Cullompton: Willan
Chapman, T. and Hough, M. (1998) Evidence Based Practice, London: HMIP
Farrant, F. (2006) ‘Knowledge production and the punishment ethic: The demise of the probation service.’ Probation Journal, 53,4: 317-333
Fulton, B. & Parkhill, T. (2009) Making the Difference: an oral history of probation in Northern Ireland. Belfast: PBNI. Available at: http://www.pbni.org.uk/archive/Publications/Other%20Publications/pbni%2025th%20book.pdf
Gorman, K. (2001) ‘Cognitive behaviourism and the search for the Holy Grail: The quest for a universal means of managing offender risk.’ Probation Journal, 48, 3: 3-9
Kemshall, H. (2002) ‘Effective practice in probation: An example of ‘Advanced Liberal’ responsibilisation?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41,1: 41-58
Lindsay, T. & Quinn, K. (2001) ‘Fair Play’ in Northern Ireland: Towards Anti-Sectarian Practice. Probation Journal, 42, 2: 102-109
McKnight, J. (2009) ‘Speaking up for Probation’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48,4: 327-343
Mair, G. (Ed.) (2004) What Matters in Probation Cullompton: Willan
Merrington, S. and Stanley, S. (2000) ‘Reflections: doubts about the what works initiative’, Probation Journal, 47, 4: 272-275
Robinson, G. & Raynor, P. (2006) ‘The future of rehabilitation: What role for the probation service?’ Probation Journal, 53,4: 334-346
Vanstone, M. (2004) ‘Mission control: The origins of a humanitarian service.’ Probation Journal, 51, 1: 34-47
Week 2 – Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions
Date: 29/09/09
Lecture: 10am -1pm – Nicola Carr
Lecture: 2pm -4pm – Nicola Carr
These lectures will focus on the development and use of community penalties. Students will learn about the development of the ‘what works’ initiative and the drive towards effective, evidence-based practice. Key issues such as risk management and public protection will be explored and students will be encouraged to critically evaluate these developments.
Key developments in working with offenders will be outlined including some of the most recent methods of intervention based on research evidence.
Key Reading – Working with offending behaviour- Principles, Methods and Interventions
Andrews, D., Bonta, J. and Hoge, R. (1990a) ‘Classification for effective rehabilitation’, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17 ,1: 19-52.
Andrews, D. et al. (1990b) ‘Does correctional treatment work?’ Criminology, 28, 369-404
Ansbro, M. (2008) ‘Using attachment theory with offenders.’ Probation Journal, 55,3: 231-244
Bailie, R. (2006) ‘Women Offenders: The Development of a Policy and Strategy for Implementation by the Probation Board for Northern Ireland’ Irish Probation Journal, 3, 1:97-110
Batchelor, S. (2004) ‘Prove me the bam!’ Victimization and agency in the lives of young women who commit violent offences.’ Probation Journal, 52, 4: 358-375
Bhui, H.S. & Buchanan, J. (2004) ‘What Works?’ and complex individuality.’ Probation Journal, 51,3: 195-196
Bottoms, A. and Williams, W. (1979) ‘A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice’ British Journal of Social Work, 9,2: 160-201
Burnett R & Roberts C (2004) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Developing Evidence Based Practice. Cullompton: Willan
Burnett, R. & McNeill, F. (2005) ‘The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime.’ Probation Journal, 52,3: 221-242
Bushway, S.D.; Thornberry, T.P. & Krohn, M.D. (2003) ‘Desistance as a developmental process: A comparison of static and dynamic approaches.’ Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 2: 129-153
Cherry, S. (2005) Transforming Behaviour: Pro-social Modelling in Practice. Cullompton: Willan
Dixon, L. & Ray, L. (2007) ‘Current issues and developments in race hate crime’ Probation Journal, 54,2: 109-124
Farrall, S. & Bowling, B. (1999) ‘Structuration, human development and desistance from crime.’ British Journal of Criminology 17, 2: 255-267
Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan
Healy, D. & O’Donnell, I. (2008) ‘Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish Probationers.’ Probation Journal, 55,1: 25-38
Jordan, R. & O’Hare, G. (2007) ‘ The Probation Board for Northern Ireland’s Cognitive Self-Change Programme: An overview of the pilot programme in the community.’ Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 125-136
Loughran, H. (2006) ‘A place for Motivational Interviewing in Probation?’ Irish Probation Journal, 3,1: 17-29
Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What works? Questions and answers about prison reform’, ThePublic Interest, 10, 22-54
McCulloch, P. (2005) ‘Probation, social context and desistance: retracing the relationship.’ Probation Journal, 52,1: 8-22
McGuire, J. & Priestly, P. (1995) ‘Reviewing “what works”: Past, present and future.’ In J. McGuire (Ed.) What Works in Reducing Re-offending. Sussex: Wiley
McNeill, F. (2001) ‘Developing effectiveness: Frontline Perspectives’, Social Work Education, 20,6: 671-678
McNeill, F. (2006) ‘A desistance paradigm for offender management’ Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1: 39-62
McWilliams, W. (1987) ‘Probation, pragmatism and policy’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26,2:97-121
Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. Washington D.C. : American Psychological Association
Maruna, S.; Immarigeon, R. & LeBel, T.P. (2004) ‘Ex-offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice’ In: S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds.) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Integration, Cullompton: Willan
Miller, W. & Rollnick, S. (2006) Motivational Interviewing, Gilford Press, New York
Raynor, P. & Vanstone, M. (1994) ‘Probation practice, effectiveness and the non-treatment paradigm’, British Journal of Social Work, 24,4: 387-404
Rex, S. (1999) ‘Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 4: 366-383
Rex, S. & Bottoms, A. (2003) ‘Evaluating the evaluators: Researching the accreditation of offender programmes.’ Probation Journal, 50,4: 359-368
Smith, D. (2004) ‘The uses and abuses of positivism’, in G. Mair (Ed.) What Matters in Probation, Cullompton: Willan
Vanstone, M. (2000) ‘Cognitive-behavioural work with offenders in the UK: a history of an influential endeavour’, Howard Journal, 39,2: 171-183
Week 3 – Assessment in criminal justice contexts
Date: 06/10/09
Lecture: 10am – 1pm – Nicola Carr
Assessing the risk of re-offending and the risk of harm is one of the core tasks of the social worker within the criminal justice system .This lecture will cover the background of assessment and some of the factors that impact on assessment. Particular attention will be paid to research evidence concerning, dynamic and static risk factors in relation to offending. In addition, attention will be paid to protective factors and research relating to desistance from crime. An overview will be provided of a range of risk assessment tools currently in use within the criminal justice system.
Tutorial: 09/09/09(Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2) – Nicola Carr and Alan Harpur
This tutorial will be in a workshop format and will focus on the use of risk assessment tools in relation to the assessment of the risk re-offending and risk of harm with the aim of planning interventions to address these areas.
Assessment in criminal justice contexts
Aye-Maung, N. & Hammond, N. (2000) ‘Risk of re-offending and Needs Assessments: The User’s Perspective. (Home Office Research Study 216). London: Home Office
Best, P. (2007) ‘ The Assessment, Case Management and Evaluation System (ACE) in Northern Ireland.’ Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 101-107
Kemshall, H. (1998) Risk in Probation Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate
Kemshall, H. (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Berkshire: Open University Press
Kemshall, H. (2008) Understanding the Management of High Risk Offenders. Berkshire: Open University Press
Merrington, S. & Skinns, J. (2002) ‘Using ACE to Profile Criminogenic Needs’, Probation Studies Unit ACE Practitioner Bulletin No. 1, University of Oxford. Available at: http://www.crim.ox.ac.uk/publications/psubull1.pdf
O’Dwyer, G. (2008) ‘A Risk Assessment and Risk Management Approach to Sexual Offending for the Probation Service.’ Irish Probation Journal, Vol. 5: 84-91
Robinson, G. (2002) ‘Exploring risk management in probation practice: contemporary developments in England and Wales.’ Punishment and Society, 4, 1: 5-25
Robinson, G. (2003) ‘Implementing OASys: lessons from research into LSI-R and ACE’ Probation Journal, 50, 1:30-40
Week 4 – The impact of offending – working with victims of crime and Restorative Justice approaches
Date: 13/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm – Nicola Carr
This lecture will address issues concerning the impact of crime, and will explore issues relating to victims of crime. The concept of the ‘victim’ of crime will be critically assessed with reference to a range of literature, and the victim’s role within the criminal justice system will be explored. The role of the Social Worker in working with victims of crime will also be analysed.
The principles and practices of restorative justice approaches will be examined and explored specifically in relation to the Northern Ireland context.
Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Victim Panel – Susan Reid, Victim Support, Northern Ireland and Christine Hunter, PBNI Victims Unit)
The afternoon lecture will involve a panel presentation from representatives from two agencies working with victims of crime. The presenters will focus on particular issues and themes relating to their work and students will have an opportunity to discuss the issues raised.
Victims and the Impact of Crime
Hoyle, C. & Zedner, L. (2007) ‘Victims, victimization and the criminal justice system.’ In M. Maguire; R. Morgan & R. Reiner (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Fourth Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hunter, C. (2005) ‘The View of Victims of Crime on How the Probation Board for Northern Ireland Victim Information Scheme Might Operate’ Irish Probation Journal, 2,1: 43-47
Norton, S. (2007) ‘The place of victims in the Criminal Justice System.’ Irish Probation Journal, 4,1: 63-76
Williams, B. (2009) ‘Victims’ In: C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin & E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press
Restorative Justice
Braithwaite, J. (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell C, Devlin R, O’Mahony D, Doak J (2005) Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth conferencing Service NIO Research and Statistical Series: Report No 12
Daly, K. (2002) ‘Restorative Justice: The real story’ Punishment and Society, 4,1: 55-79
Daly, K. & Stubbs, J. (2006) ‘Feminist engagement with restorative justice.’ Theoretical Criminology, 10, 1: 9-28
Gelsthorpe, L. & Morris, A. (2002) ‘Restorative youth justice. The last vestiges of welfare?’ In: J. Muncie; G. Hughes & E. McLaughlin (Eds.) Youth Justice Critical Readings. London: Sage
Gray, P. (2005) ‘The politics of risk and young offenders’ experiences of social exclusion and restorative justice.’ British Journal of Criminology, 45,6: 938-957
Hamill, H. (2002) ‘Victims of paramilitary Punishment Attacks in Belfast.’ In C. Hoyle & R. Young (Eds.) New Visions of Crime Victims, 49-70., Oxford: Hart
Hoyle, C. (2002) ‘Securing restorative justice for the “Non-Participating” Victim’. In: In C. Hoyle & R. Young (Eds.) New Visions of Crime Victims, 97-132., Oxford: Hart
McEvoy, K. & Mika, H. (2002) ‘ Restorative Justice and the critique of informalism in Northern Ireland.’ British Journal of Criminology, 42, 3: 534-562
McLaughlin, E.; Fergusson, R.; Hughes, G. & Westmarland, L. Restorative Justice: Critical Issues London, Sage
Marshall, T. (1999) Restorative Justice: An Overview. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-resjus.pdf
Morris, A. (2002) ‘Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice.’ British Journal of Criminology, 42,3: 596-615
O’Mahony, D. & Doak, J. ‘Restorative Justice- Is More Better? The Experience of Police-led Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland’ The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 43, no. 5
Shapland, J.; Atkinson, A.; Atkinson, H.; Dignan, J.; Edwards, L; Hibbert, J. Howes, M.; Johnstone, J.; Robinson, G. & Sorsby, A. (2008) Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/restorative-justice-report_06-08.pdf
Zehr H & Towes B (EDS) – Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing
Week 5 – Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement
Date: 20/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm (Nicola Carr and Willie McAuley, PPNAI)
Public protection has formed an important part of the work of criminal justice agencies in recent years. This lecture explores the ‘public protection’ discourse, and its practical implications in relation to new ‘public protection’ arrangements.
The second part of this lecture will focus on the role of social work in relation to prisoners and their families and the role of resettlement.
Tutorial: 23/09/09(Group 1 (12-1) / Group 2 (1-2)
This tutorial will follow from this week’s lecture and address issues in relation to prisoners, the effects of imprisonment and resettlement.
Public Protection, Prisons and Resettlement
Burnett, R. & Maruna, S. (2006) ‘The kindness of prisoners: Strengths-based resettlement in theory and action.’ Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1: 83-106
Corcoran, M. (2007) ‘Normalisation and its discontents: Constructing the ‘irreconcilable’ female political prisoner in Northern Ireland.’ British Journal of Criminology, 47,3: 405-422
Her Majesty’s Inspectorates of Prison and Probation (2001) Through the Prison Gate: A Joint Thematic Review. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.uk/inspectorates/hmi-prisons/docs/prison-gate-rps.pdf
Kemshall, H. (1996) Reviewing Risk: A review of the research on the assessment and management of risk and dangerousness: Implications for policy and practice in the Probation Service. London: Home Office
Kemshall, H. & Maguire, M. (2001) ‘Public Protection, partnership and risk penality: The Multi-Agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders.’ Punishment and Society, 3,2: 237-264
Lewis, S.; Vennard, J.; Maguire, M.; Raynor, P.; Vanstone, M.; Raybould, S. & Rix, A. (2003) The Resettlement of short-term prisoners: an evaluation of seven pathfinders. London: Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/occ83pathfinders.pdf
McEvoy, K.; Shirlow, P. & McElrath, K. (2004) ‘Resistance, transition and exclusion: Politically motivated ex-prisoners and conflict transformation in Northern Ireland. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16, 3: 646-670
Maguire, M. & Raynor, P. (2006) ‘How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: Or does it?’ Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1:19-38
Maruna, S. & Liebling, A. (2004) The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan
Matthews, R. (2009) ‘Prisons’ in C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin & E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press
Public Protection Arrangements Northern Ireland (PPANI) Guidance to Agencies. Belfast: Northern Ireland Office. Available at: http://www.publicprotectionni.com/
Scraton, P. & Moore, L. (2004) The Hurt Inside. The Imprisonment of women and girls in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. Available at: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/oct/the-hurt-inside-nihrc.pdf
Scraton, P. & Moore, L. (2005) ‘Degradation, harm and survival in a women’s prison.’ Social Policy and Society, 5, 1: 67-7
Wahidin, A. (2009) ‘Ageing’ in prison: crime and the criminal justice system.’ In: C. Hale; K, Hayward; A. Wahidin & E. Wincup (Eds.) Criminology (Second Edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Week 6: Working with young people in the criminal justice system – balancing welfare and justice?
Date: 27/10/09
Lecture: 10am to 1pm – Nicola Carr
Working with young people who are involved in the criminal justice system involves addressing the context of offending and the welfare needs of the young person. This lecture will cover the theories and practices that inform this work, with reference to research literature and the current system and policy context in Northern Ireland.
Lecture: 2pm to 4pm (Kelvin Doherty, Youth Justice Agency)
The afternoon lecture will be delivered by Kelvin Doherty, from the Youth Justice Agency, who will provide an overview of the youth conferencing service in Northern Ireland. The lecture will focus on the aims, rationale and operation of youth conferences through an interactive session.
Working with Young People in the Criminal Justice System
Campbell, C.; Devlin, R.; O’Mahony, D.; Doak, J.; Jackson, J.; Corrigan, T. & McEvoy, K. (2006) Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conference Service. Belfast: Northern Ireland Office. Available: http://www.nio.gov.uk/evaluation_of_the_northern_ireland_youth_conference_service.pdf
Ellison, G. (2001) Young People, Crime, Policing and Victimisation in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Queen’s University. Available at: http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/police/ellison00.htm
Graham, J. & Bowling, B. (1995) Young People and Crime (Home Office Research Study No. 145), London: Home Office
Hamilton, J.; Radford, K. & Jarman, N. (2003) Policing, Accountability and Young People. Belfast: Institute for Conflict Research. Available at: http://www.conflictresearch.org.uk/documents/policeyp.pdf
Include Youth (2008) A Manifesto for Youth Justice in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Include Youth. Available at: http://www.includeyouth.org/fs/doc/Include-Youth-Manifesto-2008.pdf
Leonard, M. (2004) Children in Interface Areas: Reflections from North Belfast. Belfast: Save the Children
Muncie, J. (2004) Youth and Crime (Second Edition) London: Sage
NICCY (2008) Children in Conflict with the Law and the Administration of Juvenile Justice. Belfast: NICCY. Available at: http://www.niccy.org/uploaded_docs/1_71784_NIC71784%20Childrens%20Rights%20Text%208.pdf
