Home Energy Management System
1) INTRODUCTION
Network of electricity that intelligently integrates with users actions connected to network for sustainable, economical and secure supply is called smart grid [1]. Smart grid is called smart due to fast communication and networking capabilities. Smart grid has an important role in energy structure adjustment, coping with climate changes and economic development [2].
Since 1982 energy demand during peak hour is increasing 25% approximately every year [3]. New intelligent devices must be used to fulfill energy requirements. In order to add intelligence new technologies are to be developed. Electric intelligence is only requirement for operational cost and energy consumption reduction [4]. These new technologies should be able to remove peak load and off load power difference, should be capable of making demand-supply curve smoother and should reduce environmental pollution. In smart grid user plays a vital role in reducing and optimizing energy consumption thus improving system efficiency. In smart grid emission of CO2 and household energy consumption is reduced by 9% and 10% respectively [5]
In order to improve electricity consumption keeping in view of consumer’s need there should be an optimum solution. Different optimization techniques can be used for energy management. Different technologies like home area networks, home automation, advanced metering infrastructure and bidirectional communication are introduced by smart grid during past few years [6]. Now a days Zigbee and sensor networks not only monitors the quality of power but use powerful strategy for communication and distribution and sale locally generated energy back to grid [7] [8].
Demand Side Management (DSM) system is important utilization efficiency parameters which have been ignored due to complex dynamics of consumption, random behavior of consumers and lack of commutation technology. The advancement in communication technology has revolutionized the power sector and introduced a concept of new modernized electrical system called as Smart grid [9] .The concept of demand side management was first introduced in late 1970’s which reduces GHG, provides reliable energy reducing the electricity cost [10]. Traditional grids consists of DSM but do not provide such type of reliability to users due lack of sensors and inefficient automation and communication. But smart grid is more efficient due introduction of low cost sensors, smart meters and integration of ICT [11]. Challenges faced by smart grid is shown below
Interoperability is said to satisfy if multiple communication network coexist in smart grid. Scalability means increasing number of hardware’s in proportion to others but due to increase in demand this become a major issue can be solved by using sensing networks. Smart grid holds different communities and societies which become an issue in order to resolve it integration of power system is required which is done with actuation, security and communication networks. Security is main issue in smart grid because a hacker can interrupt the data of smart grid and easily access to smart meters so this issue can be resolve by modernization the security and by data hiding [12].
The smart grid consists of HEMS that enable demand response and demand side management. On the basis of power supply demand response is responsible for altering and managing the energy and demand side management (DSM) controls the planning, techniques and implementation of policies [13]. There are two major schemes of HEMS one is communication and 2nd one is optimization [14].
Home energy management systems consist of three basic functional blocks [15]:
HEMS software
Home energy management center(HEMC)
Load scheduler.
HEMC provides customer’s user’s friendly graphical representation which not only provides assistance to customers but also give them control over various loads using load scheduler.
HEMC software uses lab view developer tool that provides necessary information to customers using Zigbee protocol. It has two main sectors a) home tab b) data tab.
The information load control, line control and on/off control is provided by home tab on/off control use in switching sequence and its major application is that it is used to detect any abnormality in hardware. The data logging of current and voltage with in time is represented by data tab.
Load scheduler considers the bundle of single knapsack known as multiple knapsacks due to which customers become aware of peak load at specific time and interval of occurrence. A load scheduler not only determines the critical and non-critical loads but also time dependent loads. In emergency conditions it also controls various loads. This also stores data of electricity consumption 24/7.
Energy management is an organized and systematic coordination of procurement, conversion, distribution and use of energy to meet the requirements, taking into account environmental and economic objectives [16]. Energy management systems are computer aided tools that are used by operators of utility grid for controlling, monitoring and optimizing the generation and transmission system performance.
In efficient energy consumption the participation of end user is as much important as the supplier. In modern power supply systems end users’ are provided with RT-feedback (real-time feedback) via different website portals, in-home displays (IHD), or some other feedback viewer device like mobile etc. [17]. Provision of feedback to end user will motivate them to alter their energy usage to minimize the electricity bills.
In present smart grid system end users’ are forced for shifting their energy usage on peak to off peak hours regardless of their comfort and life style [17]. All over the world major portion of energy is consumed by residential users, so they can play an important role for energy optimization. Research shows that energy consumption is minimized by 12% by installing energy consumption information system and displays energy consumption of whole unit [18].
Due to advancement in technology the industries has become advance due to which energy demand increases which results in load shedding and blackouts and use of fossil fuel is increases which will finish soon. Now world is going toward non-conventional energy resources like solar and photovoltaic cells but in order to provide information regarding to electricity to customers the smart hems use analogue and digital systems which is an efficient methodology.
Home energy management systems play a fantastic role in distribution of energy via conventional grid and homes optimistically.
With increasing demand of energy the communication in wired as well as in wireless medium is increased. Internet connection and intranet connection is makes low cost smart homes. Zigbee is one of the devices that uses for communication between smart homes and smart grid.
Zigbee alliance introduced Zigbee standard protocol based on IEEE 802.15.4 standard set by IEEE and new standard committee (NESCOM) for low rates wireless personal area network [15]. Zigbee consists of four layers.
Zigbee
Zigbee alliance platform
IEEE 802.15.4
There is a great difference between energy production and consumption, low production cause deficiency of electricity supply. World energy production pie chart is shown as
There are many optimization techniques that are used for optimization one of which is knapsack. In knapsack there are many algorithms used for obtaining the best optimized result. In this paper we will make comparative study of some algorithms of knapsack and we will find the best solution obtained from these algorithms.
Comparison of different home energy management schemes:
Optimization based residential energy management:
It is the linear programming model basic purpose of this model is minimization of electricity cost at residential areas [1]. In this scheme a day of 24 hours is divided into equal time slots having equal lengths consists of various prices of electricity like time of use (TOU) tariffs. The objective function shows that with proper scheduling we can reduce the energy expenses by division of home appliances in time slots. ?????
Objective function is defined as
EI DI Ut St
Where I define number of appliances, E defines energy consumption of appliance, J number of days, DI length of cycle of appliance, K number of requests, Ut unit price for slot t and T number of time slots.
IN home energy management (iHEM):
This scheme use smart appliances like energy management unit (EMU) and wireless sensor home area network (WSHANs) for communication purposes between appliances (IHEMS). It also uses (Zigbee) protocol, wireless sensor networks and cluster tree topology. In this scheme customer may turn on appliance at any moment without being worried about peak hours. In home energy management (iHEM) gives suitable time to customer for appliance use. ????
How iHEM works a request package is sent by appliance to EMU at the start, on receiving the packet EMU communicates with storage system in order to know available energy. Energy management unit (EMU) than communicates with smart meter for current prices. The storage unit send available reply containing information about storage energy when EMU receives packet, it schedules the suitable start time according to iHEM algorithm. It also reduces the carbon emission and energy consumption cost.
2) KNAPSACK:
The single knapsack is a problem of combinatorial optimization having objects, values and weights packed into knapsack of specific capacity such that value of object is maximized [19] .The multiple knapsack is generalization of single knapsack problem it is resource allocation problem consists of M resources and set of N objects [19]- [20]. Knapsack problem is basically an items set that have different weights and values. Our choice of item must be in such a way that it should be maximum among the weights of given items.
Knapsack allows community to use energy efficiently in order to achieve their goals. It not only minimizes the customer bills but force them to use their heavy appliances other than peak hours. It is estimated that energy demands overall around the world increasing 25 percent per year so its great challenge for us to fulfill the demand [21]. In order to overcome the increasing demand of energy we need to optimize energy usage. Knapsack is one of the optimization technique used for optimizing a problem.
2.1) Types of Knapsack: There are different types of knapsack which are as 1) 0-1Knapsack problem. 2) Bounded Knapsack problem. 3) Unbounded Knapsack problem.
2.1.1) 0-1 Knapsack problem (binary Knapsack): In such case the item is either taken or not taken (accepted / rejected) there are no other possibilities. Suppose a set of ’n’ items having different weights and values say ‘wi’ and ‘vi’, xi is the number of copies of item of set ‘n’. In mathematical form:
Maximize ixi
Subject to i xi ? W Here Xi {0, 1}
2.1.2) Bounded Knapsack Problem: In bounded knapsack problem restriction on xi is removed i.e. xi is an integer value in BKP. In BKP restriction is applied on copies of each item of set ‘n’ to some integer value say ‘ci’. Mathematically:
Maximize ixi
Subject to i xi ? WHere xi {0, 1… ci}
2.1.3) Unbounded Knapsack Problem: In unbounded knapsack problem no restriction is applied on xi. Mathematically:
Maximize ixi
Subject to i xi ? WHere xi ? 0.
2.2) Algorithms for Knapsack: There are many algorithms for solving 0-1 knapsack problems which are as [22]:
2.2.1) Brute Force: It is a straight forward approach based on statement of problem and concepts’ definition. If there are n items that can be chosen from a set of given items then there will be 2n possible combination of items for knapsack. There is a bit string of 0’s and 1’s, if the string is 1 of an item then it is chosen if 0 then not chosen.
2.2.2) Dynamic Programming: It is a technique in which a complex problem is divided into smaller sub problems. These sub-problems are then solved and are recorded in table. Thus table obtain is utilize to solve original problem.
The complexity of this algorithm is O (NlogN).
2.2.3) Greedy Algorithm: This algorithm requires some common sense and problem solving experience for solving problem. It’s a decision making process which may have following steps:
1) Choosing such item that has maximum value in knapsack.
2) Choose item with less weight.
3) Choose item with high value to weight ratio.
2.2.4) Genetic Algorithm: It is an algorithm used to search best solution among different possible solution of a problem. It begins with a solution set and each set is called population. A new population is made from old population by selecting them according to certain specified fitness level.
3) Appliance Usage Control: In [23] consumption of electricity is not always rational it also depends on human psychology factors. Different people use different appliances at different time slots. Now if we consider some appliances we can classify them into following categories:
1) Must Run Appliances: Appliances whose time slot cannot be changed and they must run comes in this category.
2) Fixed Run Appliances: Appliances that run only once a day at specific time.
3) Flexible Appliances: Appliances that can be run at any time in a day they don’t have fixed time.
Some of the household devices are shown below:
Oven LampRefrigerator Fan
Considering human psychology factor the use of appliances can be categorize as:
1) Emergency Use: Appliances that use in some sort of emergency.
2) Welfare: Appliances that use for welfare
3) Enjoyment: Appliances that use for enjoyment purpose.
Taking an example of personnel computer that is used by student for his working purpose or for emergency while an adult use it for enjoyment purpose.
In order to make decision on which appliance should be used during peak hour follows analytic hierarchy process.
Bibliography
[1]
P. Nabbuurs, “Strategic Deployment Document For Europe’s Electricity Networks of The Future,” 2008.
[2]
Yanfeng Chen , Guoqing Xu, Qi Zhang , Ludovic Krundel Yimin Zhou, “Home energy management with PSO in Smart Grid,” 2014.
[3]
US Department of Energy, “The Smart Grid: An Introduction,” 2009.
[4]
S.Electric, “Leading the way in energy efficiency,” 2009.
[5]
http://www.smartgrids.eu/.
[6]
US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. www.oe.energy.gov.
[7]
S. Massoud Amin and B. F. Wollenberg, ““Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century,”,” IEEE Power and Energy Mag, vol. 3.
[8]
A. Vaccaro and D. Villacci, ““Performance analysis of low earth orbit satellites for power system communication,”,” Electric Power systems Research, vol. 73, pp. 287-294, 2005.
[9]
Yuhui Shi, “Particle swarm optimization. Electronic data systems, Inc.,” pp. 8-13, 2004.
[10]
S. Bavarian, and L. Lampe A. Ghassemi, ““Cognitive Radio for Smart Grid Communications,”,” First IEEE International Conference Smart Grid Communications, pp. 297-302, 2010.
[11]
F. Rahimi and A. Ipakchi, ““Demand Response as a Market Resource Under the Smart Grid Paradigm,”,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, pp. 82-88, june 2010.
[12]
U.S. Department of Energy, ““A vision for the modern Grid,”,” March 2007.
[13]
Yi Qian, Hamid Sharif, and David Tipper Ye Yan, “” A Survey on Smart Grid Communication Infrastructures: Motivations, Requirements and Challenges””.
[14]
IEC-TC 57, ““Communication networks and systems in substations- Part 1: Introduction and overview,”,” vol. Edition 1.0, 2003.
[15]
Pradeepa Palraj and Reena Kumar Sampathkumar Alzwar, “A Novel Energy Management of Smart Home,” vol. 3, May 2014.
[16]
“VDI-Guideline,” vol. VDI 4602, p. 3, 2007.
[17]
Omar Hussain and Azadeh Rajabian Tabesh Omid Ameri Sianaki, “A knapsack problem approach for achieving efficient energy consumption in smart grid for end users’ life style,” 2010.
[18]
Ryo Inada, Osamu Saeki, and Kiichiro Tsuji Tsuyoshi Ueno, ““Effectiveness of Displaying Energy Consumption Data in Residential Houses – Analysis on How the Residents Respond,”,” Proceedings of ECEEE 2005 Summer Study, 2005.
[19]
U. Pferschy, and D. Pisinger H. Kellerer, “Knapsack Problems,” 2004.
[20]
R. Inada, O. Saeki, and K. Tsuji, T. Ueno, ““Effectiveness of an energy consumption information system for residential buildings,””.
[21]
T. Matsuyama, ““Creating safe, secure, and environment-friendly lifestyles through i-Energy,”,” vol. 21, pp. 1–8, 2009.
[22]
Dipti Shrestha Maya Hristakeva, “Different Approaches to Solve the 0/1 Knapsack Problem”.
[23]
A. Suzuki, Y Fuwa and T. Sato Y. Yamamoto, “Decision making in electrical appliance use in home ,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, pp. 1679-1686, 2008.
