Similarities Between Shembe And Jesus Of Nazareth Theology Religion Essay

Using the above as a brief introduction it is my task to present to you an understanding of the Doctrine of Christology and therefore it is my major concern that this paper will highlight the following:

Are there similarities between Shembe and Jesus as to who should be the head of the church?

How worship aided the development of Christology:

Biblical References.

Names/Titles of Jesus.

Development of the Doctrine and the various Heresies of Christology.

Messianic phenomenon.

Conclusion.

1) Are there similarities between Shembe and Jesus of Nazareth as to who should be the head of the Church?

At first glance I would have to say no. Because just by reading the article in the Mail & Guardian it shows that even though there is a power struggle currently happening as to who should become the head of the Shembe church (Nazareth Baptist church) it is nothing like what happened in the first century. Jesus was divine and He was the Messiah. He had no offspring to inherit the Church. In fact Jesus never came to earth to start a church it happened out of necessity to be able to spread the living Word through His disciples. However if we had to take the Disciples into consideration then this power struggle did exist and it would be relevant. But Christ is still alive and the Church still exists and this places Him at the Head of the Christian Church (Sosibo, 2012).

2) How worship aided the development of Christology:

To be able to understand Christology in full it is necessary to look at worship of Jesus and the way His early followers worshiped Him to the extent of calling Him God. Therefore we need to understand what worship is. Worship is defined as a noun: ‘adoration paid, as to a god” and as a verb “to pay divine honours to”. It is also important that we do not just focus on the formal act of worship e.g. prayer and adoration but that we reflect on the attitudes that led people to calling Jesus divine, taking into consideration what they actually thought about Him and what their experience of Him was. This worship was a very specific language that was used when Jesus was still alive, when He died, when He rose and which is still used today. It was based on actual experiences that they had of Him and that it was not just an after thought when writers were writing the New Testament (France, 1981).

We need to remember that we are not just discussing any kind of worship but the worship of God. It takes place in very specific time frame: the first Century, in a very specific place: Palestine, within a very specific religion: Judaism who had faith in only one God and who lived under severe rules and the Laws of Moses. However at the same time the Hellenistic cultures were scattered throughout Palestine and they worshiped many gods, many heroes and an emperor (France, 1981).

I mention this because it must have been very difficult for the average Jew to say to other Jewish people that he was NOW a follower, a believer and a worshiper of a man called Jesus. Who was born from a virgin woman, who had a trade as a carpenter, who was baptized by John the Baptist and the Holy Spirit! This Jesus had amazing teachings, He spoke with authority, He was able to heal the sick, drive out demons, feed the people, walk on water, calm storms, and He cleared the Temple, all in the name of His Father, God. Not just that but this Jesus was arrested, He was crucified, He died, His body was laid in a tomb, He rose from the dead after three days, He then ascended into Heaven, He sits on the right hand of God the Father, He sent the Holy Spirit to be the comforter to Gods people and He vows that He will return and bring Divine Justice to all. Not just that but His death on the cross represented the ultimate sacrifice for Gods people and His resurrection the salvation for all Gods people meaning that every person in the world would receive His grace to be able to be forgiven and to receive the eternal life that God promises, if they follow, believe and worship Jesus Christ the Son of God, who is = 100% man and = 100% God.

The worship of Jesus took place in all of these events and was reflected in the writings of the New Testament therefore it is imperative that a brief reflection on the scriptures are done to give the reader an insight into the way Jesus was and is to be worshiped as God.

Biblical Reference:

Even though the Church Councils did not necessarily only engage in the New Testament it is vital that some of these scriptures are noted as a foundation for Christology. (John 1:1, 3, 14) it says “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth” others are (2 Cor. 5:19) “that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christaˆ¦”, (Col. 2:9) “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form”, (Heb.1:2-3) “but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe. The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word” (NIV, 1999).

These writings might not add up to the actual doctrine of Christology but they do endorse the doctrine without actually explaining how the Carpenter Jesus became the pre-existent of the Son of God. The Disciples, Paul and other writers of the New Testament were content with Jesus being both God and man. They HAD what was needed to proclaim and worship Jesus, therefore they were not interested in HOW Jesus came to being (Furness, 1973, p24-5).

Other writings that are of utmost importance: Acts 2:36 – Assurance – Lord and Christ, Philippians 2:8-11 – Exaltation – Every Knee shall bow, Romans 10:8-13 – Belief and Confession, 1 Corinthians 16:22 – Maranatha – O Lord come, Acts 7:59 – Time of Need, 2 Corinthians 12:8 – Pleading with the Lord (Khuzwayo, 2012).

Titles/Names:

When discussing Christology it is important that the Titles/Names of Jesus Christ are honored as they play a vital role in the worship of God. McGrath and Berkhof both have similar outlooks on the Titles/Names that were used in the New Testament. The following were predominantly used and are in no specific order. 1) Jesus: It has its origin from the Hebrew word ‘to save’ it assigns Christ as the Saviour, 2) Christ: This word means ‘the anointed one’ – Jesus was anointed by the Holy Spirit and historically this took place when he was conceived and baptized – also when anointed He received His office of prophet, priest and king, 3) Son of Man: This is name that Jesus often used when referring to Himself but was seldom used by man. It shows the humanity of Jesus but also reflects His superhuman character and when Jesus returns He will be bringing the divine judgment, 4) Son of God: This is reflected most in John and the writings of Paul and it shows a relation with Jesus and believers. However the word ‘son’ (huios) is reserved for Jesus and ‘children’ (tekna) are applied to the believers and is in direct relation to God. Jesus is the only begotten Son of God whereas the believers are called son (man and women) of God through adoption, 5) Lord: The social group of that time and His disciples would have used lord as a polite way of addressing Jesus. After Jesus’ resurrection the word Lord had a deeper significance and was used in some cases to appoint Jesus at the head/ruler and owner of the Church, but more significantly make Jesus (Lord) equivalent to the name of God (Berkhof, 1971, p85-6), (McGrath, 2011, p268-272).

3) Development of the Doctrine and the various Heresies of Christology:

As noted before Christology did not just come about. It was in 451 AD that a basic consensus on Christology had been reached at the forth Ecumenical Council at Chalcedon. However to get to that point there were major conflicts and it is necessary at this time to discuss these conflicts because they led to heresies that were not acceptable to the Church. The three major conflicts are 1) The denial of the Divinity of Christ, 2) The denial of the Humanity of Christ, and 3) The denial of the Unity of Christ (De Gruchy, 1994, p55-6). Before discussing the conflicts in detail it is very important to note that the Council of Chalcedon was also used to try and unite the Church of the East (Alexandria) and the West (Antioch) but division and the theology was too great and a union never took place. However as we will see below the mainline Church did establish ground rules on the teaching of Christology and in which the concepts of Christology is still used today (Jensen, 2003, p198).

1) The denial of the Divinity of Christ came about because of the following statements within the definition of Chalcedon: ‘the same perfect in Godhead’, ‘truly God’, ‘consubstantial (Homoousios) with the Father in the Godhead’, and ‘begotten from the Father before the ages as regards His Godhead’. The two main heresies that took place were the Ebionite heresy and the Arian heresy. When the denial of the Ebionite heresy took place it was made clear that a heresy is not totally false but seizes portions of the truth at the cost of the full truth (De Gruchy, 1994, p57-8).

The Ebionites were Jewish followers of Jesus. They “believed that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah sent from the Jewish God to the Jewish people in the fulfillment of the Jewish Scripture” (Ehrman, 2003, p100). They did not believe that Jesus was divine or that He pre-existed. They also did not believe that a Virgin woman could conceive Jesus. Jesus was human like any other person and through sexual intercourse between Joseph and Mary was born. God chose and adopted Jesus as His son. Because: a) Jesus kept God’s laws perfectly, b) Jesus was the most righteous man alive, c) God new that Jesus would do whatever He asked. Therefore, Jesus sacrificed Himself not for His own sins but for the sins of the world. God’s promises to the Jews were kept and Holy Scripture fulfilled. God then raised Jesus up and exalted him to heaven (Ehrman, 2003, p99-103).

The Arian heresy had two key players Arius a presbyter of Antioch and Athanasius the archdeacon of Alexandria. Arius believed and took the stand similar to monotheistic principles of the Monarchians. “There is only one unbegotten God, one unoriginated Being, without any beginning of existence” (Berkhof, 1975, p84). He also believed that the Son became incarnate and had a beginning and therefore was adopted by God and became the ‘Son of God’ in view of his future glory which entitled him to be worshiped by men. Whereas Athanasius believed: “While the Father and the Son are of the same divine essence, there is no division or separation in the essential Being of God, and it is wrong to speak of a ‘Theos Deuteros’”(Berkhof, 1975, p85). In AD 325 the Council of Nicea was formed and the following statement was adopted in favour of Athanasius: “We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, begotten not made, being of one substance (Homoousios) with the Father aˆ¦” (Berkhof, 1975, p87), (Berkhof, 1975, p84-7).

2) The denial of the Humanity of Christ came about because of the following statements that were defended in the definition of Chalcedon: ‘the same perfect in manhood’, ‘truly man, consisting of a rational soul and body’, ‘consubstantial (Homoousios) with us in manhood’, and ‘because of us and because of our salvation begotten from the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos, as regards his manhood’. The two main heresies that denied Jesus’ true humanity were Docetism and Apollinarianism (De Gruchy, 1994, p58-9).

Docetism was the assumption that Christ’s physical body was unreal and when He suffered and died it was all for the sake of appearance. This heresy contradicted everything in the Gospel and was heavily condemned by Ignatius the Bishop of Antioch (Furness, 1973, p26). Apollinarianism believed that Jesus had no soul and its place being supplied by the Word of God. This was a clear statement that Jesus was not fully human. The heretic was Leodicea and his rival was Basil, Bishop of Caesarea (Furness, 1973, p26).

3) The denial of the Unity of Christ came about in the second section of the Chalcedonian definition in which the two natures (divinity and humanity) in one person were defended and related to the following, ‘[Christ] made known in two natures without confusion, without change, without division, without separation’, ‘the difference of the natures being by no means removed because of the union’, and it speaks about ‘one person’, ‘the property of each nature being preserved and coalescing in one Person (prosopon) and one hypostasis’, and ‘not parted or divided into two persons (prosopa), but one and the same Son’. The main heresies were Monophysitism who could not believe in the two natures and were adamant that Christ only had one nature. The second heresy was Nestorianism who did not believe in the unity of the natures (divinity and humanity) in Christ the one person and portrayed Him as only a God-bearing man (De Gruchy, 1994, p60-1). Even though the Monophysitism and Nestorianism were classified as heresies these churches have stood the test of time and are still in existence today in the East and are now classified as Orthodox and are part of the World Council of Churches (Furness, 1973, p28).

Therefore it is regarded that in Chalcedon the basic doctrine of Christology was formulated however the controversies did not end there. Further studies show that Thomas Aquinas, Anselm, Reformers: Calvin and Luther and the modern Kenotic theologians have all put their mark on Christology but the basic definition still remains the same as that of Chalcedon (Furness, 1973, p28-30).

4) Messianic phenomenon:

This relates to the word Messiah (Hebrew) or Christ (Greek) which means the anointed by God. When calling someone Messiah you are directly referring to that person of having been chosen by God either to be a priest, prophet or king, but in most cases it would refer to the King, the Saviour of the Jews in the Old Testament (Campbell, 1987, p44). To many people in the Christian faith this has different meanings. We find that in most African countries this Messiah would refer to Christ the Liberator. This is the one that has been anointed by God to take the people of Africa out of there bondage and give them that which is required by God for fulfillment of their life. For other He would be the Saviour, the Healer or the Mediator (Appiah-Kubi, 1984, p74).

Conclusion:

Explain the significance of ‘signs’ in john`s gospel and why they are important to understanding his gospel?

EXPLAIN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF `SIGNS` IN JOHN`S GOSPEL AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTANDING HIS GOSPEL?INTRODUCTION:

The Gospel according to St. John, written by John the apostle as it is evidenced in M. C. Tenney`s book , explicit the purpose and the significance of his selective seven signs out of many miracles Jesus performed. John one of the closest to Jesus within the inner circle to whom describing himself as the “disciple whom Jesus loved” (John 21:20). The question is why did John select some of the seven miracles as a signs for people to believe according to his statement in John 20:30-31? The theme of his writing was to “believe”. I suggest that the period of his quietness before he wrote the book had given him enough ideas of what people think geographically, knowledge of the environment, history, and he was familiar with Jewish customs. These might give him passion to expound the reason why people need to believe in Christ as the Eternal purpose of God for their salvation as the Holy Spirit gave him grace to write the epistle. Probably people are confused and many heresies are arising against the preaching of the gospel of Christ that led many people to scepticism. These can be the reasons why he needed to proof and identifies himself as eyewitness to the miracles selected in his epistle.

In his internal and external evidence, there are four major proofs to support the significance of signs and there importance to understanding the gospel and to believe which is going to explicate the theme of the essay.

THE BODY
John was a Palestinian Jew. He had excellent knowledge of Palestinian especially of Jerusalem and its surrounding. He knows what it is happened geographically. His is aware of the head knowledge of the Judaizers and their work concerning the new covenant which Jesus laid down before His resurrection.
Eyewitness to the miracles that happened. His personality as one of the closest disciples of Jesus Christ is another factor to be able to evaluate what people feel about Jesus Christ and how are they reasoning with the good news, believing or unbelieving. His personal contact with great numbers of people, including their names (John 1:14). His testimony that people might believe his witness concerning Christ crucifixion (John 19:35).
John the apostle. His apostleship is another proof of his writing with proof of signs to acknowledge people about who Christ IS and his Eternal purpose that is, He is the way, the truth and the life, that whosoever shall believe in him shall receive eternal life (John 14:6)
His personal relationship with Jesus Christ. As he identifies himself with Jesus Christ, “the disciple whom Jesus loves”. This may give him passion to reveal the revelation and the power in Jesus Christ and his deity who is the only saviour of the world.

These four proves the importance that supports the apologetic of spiritual truth as revealed in certain events in the life of Jesus according to John witnesses with proofs of signs.

As the epistle of John stated, “the Gospel of Believe” that already signified the importance of his revelation with proofs of some strategic signs to back up his theme of declaring Christ as the Son of God and the saviour of life. These selections of the signs coordinates clauses, that is Jesus did many others, and but these are written, “That ye may believe”. The seven signs recorded in the Gospel of John reveal some very significant characterises of the power of Jesus, and they confirm His deity. They also have very definite purpose to stir up a response of acceptance or rejection, belief or unbelief. But what precisely is this life that subject from our belief in Jesus name? John revealed the importance of knowing God and His Son, Jesus Christ as He is the giver of the eternal life (John 17 :3). Tenney describes the four elements that connected us to the concept of eternal life with explanations. They are:

Consciousness; entail no knowledge without cognisant life. Through awareness you put your mind to work and wisdom expounded.
Contact; for one cannot apprehend those things with which one has neither direct nor indirect contact. Physical relationship distinguishes appreciation.
Continuity or duration; knowledge of God presupposes coexistence with him.
Development; signifies the knowledge of God must be growing, not static thing. This portrait the destiny of man which is eternal life the purpose of the teaching of the Gospel of Christ.

These four statements are very core in the goal of John thought and presentation of the Gospel.

Also Puskas and Crump in his book describes the importance of the seven signs that John selected out many miracles Jesus performed. He said these signs serve as enacted parables, an observation that may help to explain John`s neglect of the Synoptic parables. He further explained that each sign is communicating a specific significance to the eyewitnesses or the original hearers of the oral tradition which is the historical level, and the literary level, constructing a symbolic significance available only to readers of the Gospel

These seven signs moreover highlight the role of John`s literary devices considered in his writings.I will be listed the seven signs which John recorded in his epistle in orderly form. All of these signs revealed some significant characteristic of Jesus` power and person. His transcended control over the issues of life with which man unable to comprehend. These are:

The changing of water into wine (John 2:1-11). This demonstrated power and master over quality by carrying out result of vine produces over a period of months instantly. When the disciple saw Jesus miracle they believed. The miracle showed his power over nature and revealed the way He would go about His ministry helping other, speaking with authority, and being in personal touch with people. The significance of the miracle shows in the effect that it produced. This is the first miracle Jesus did at Cana of Galilee and manifested his glory. This signs promoted there believe and it was advance step beyond the reason to believe. The individuals had seen the wonders with their physical eyes and they were able to portray the person of Jesus and draw a conclusion that a superior being was among them who has proof his claims by His deed of compassion and supremacy.

The healing of the Nobleman`s son (John 4:46-54). This is incredible power demonstrated by healing the Nobleman`s son who was at great distance. Jesus proves himself the master of space and distance. This was a sign to all people that Jesus is not just a mere man but divine. This miracle enables the faith of the noble man and his family to grow. The kind of faith that prompted the nobleman to demonstrate such action was the knowledge of information gather from people gave him hope to believe that Jesus is capable of handling such crisis. The ability and faith the nobleman put to work and the confidence of his words to Jesus it shows the boldness of his trust that Jesus is the only answers to such case; “Sir, come down ere my child die”. This is a notable request without any authentic inquiry regarding his personality, and whatsoever that is running in his mind must be a positive expectation. When Jesus gave him a simple reply; “Go thy way; thy son liveth”, his response shows as he think in his mind received his expectation. And the purpose of John gospel is for people to believe in Christ divinity. The scriptures proofs that the nobleman increase in faith that led him committed himself and his household wholeheartedly to Jesus. This is very important to the gospel of believe as Tenney`s describe the contrast of believe and obey in (John3:36) in defining the former term. Belief is obedience to the utterance of God; disobedience is unbelief. Just exactly what the nobleman did. Believe is thus defined as commitment to authority rather than a passive opinion.

The healing of impotent Man (John 5:1-9). Jesus instantly cures a man afflicted with disease of thirty-eight years. This demonstrated power over time. The condition of the impotent man was already overwhelmed with depression of sickness and from physical standing point. His psychological reasoning was already affected and resigned to his fate and had accepted the inevitable. Apostle John regards this sickness as outstanding event which Jesus did to open the spiritual eyes and inner man of the people to believe Jesus Christ had arrived the saviour of life, the freedom giver no matter kinds of disaster or calamity, his present is the instant solution to the matter. This is significant to John gospel. Thirty-eight years of sickness was challenge by Jesus asking him question, “Do you want to get well?” I believe the question might appear foolish to the impotent man. But who is he or she would like to remain sick? But the expectation of the impotent man was somebody needed to help him into the pool when the water bubbled in other to achieve the miraculous powers. From Jesus close examination, His assessment shows that the impotent man was bound by his circumstances and could not rise higher than pointless complaint. But Christ shows compassion on those who are helpless and been reduced both in body, hope, faith, and in spirit. The authority of Jesus and the command over the sickness bring an instant turning around over his helplessness in body, hope, faith and spirit. Jesus said, “Rise take up thy bed, and walk. And immediately the man was made whole and walked. This is unusual miracles that brought a new faces into the gospel of believe.

The feeding of the Five thousand (John 6:1-4). Jesus proves himself to be the master of quantity by multiplying the five loaves and two small fishes of one boy’s lunch to feed five thousand men besides women and children. This is incredible circumstance beyond human expectation, even though the disciples who have being with him who had witnesses several miracles cannot still confidently succumbed to the situation even though the master is within them with the way they reasoning and their imagination. But Jesus Christ who is the master of quantity proofs beyond the reactions of the disciples. The superiority of Jesus overrules the kinds of educational knowledge which apply in the context of their calculation by Philip as statistical pessimist and Andrew who was ingenious optimist. These could still not help the situation. The miraculous multiplications by the hand of Jesus in breaking the bread and fish into edible fragments is call the work of a sign and the prophetic of Jesus` sufficiency in the midst of deficiency, and of His ability to make sacred meagreness gratify the need of the starving. The amazing things the audience reaction is to make Jesus their king, the messiah which is the main theme and the significance of John gospel.

The walking on the water (John 6:16-21). Jesus shows power over nature. This is incredible event that created fear to Jesus Christ disciples. The event has a significant meaning to the disciples why they have the ideas of the weather, this made them to sail before Jesus came, and they could not afford to take risk. I could not imagine how they expected Jesus to join them if they finally cross over. I believe Jesus allowed this to happen to them so that they can understand his deity and power over nature. Also Jesus expected them to act in their faith as they saw him approaching them instead they were afraid. Faith is a mindset that expects God to act when we act upon this expectation, we can overcome our fears. John saw this miracle as a incredible event that proof Christ authority over nature, that is why himself included it in his gospel of believe.

The healing of the Man Born Blind (John 9:1-12). Jesus anointing a blind man since his birth with clay and he received his sight by obedient. This is power over disaster or misfortune. In some of the miracles Jesus did as recorded in John`s gospel, sickness were influenced by the operation of evil forces in the world. Sin and evil caused disease was seen as part of the total fallenness of God`s creation. John declares in his gospel of believe that people could be set free from the domination of sin over lives not only in terms of any wrong doing that individual might committed. If the healing miracles show Jesus releasing individual people from the power of sin, the nature miracles show Jesus doing the same for the whole of creation. This is to prove that Jesus has power over the power of sin that lead to sickness that is He is the life giver, the giver of eternal life to them that believe in him.

The Raising of Lazarus (John 11:1-46). This miracle shows Jesus was the master of death. His transcended control over dead is unquestionably. It was the last enormous miracle Jesus did and recorded in John gospel. Jesus proof of his claim to be the resurrection and the life. Since sign and miracles are symbolic meaning to the gospel of believe, John draw out this last event as the close up mastery among the sign recorded in his written. The dissection of belief and unbelief which had already become obvious in the crowd became predetermined after the miracle. Jesus gave a new interpretation of the event that cause, if John the Baptist did prophesy what Jesus is going to do and people witness that: “but all things whatsoever John spoke of this man were true” (John 10:14). The chance for sign on John`s prophesies and Jesus deeds was a powerful factor in creating belief.

The sign were arranged chronologically as well as the effects of each sign in Tenney`s diagram . These signs were important to understand Christ superiority over the factors of life with which human is unable to handle. The event of signs revealed the proof of his deity and key to understand the purpose of eternal life as Christ is both eternal and human. However, the purposes of these signs are for the person to believe in God as well as Jesus is the son of God that they may have life in his name (Zoe Grk) as it is carefully defined by Jesus in (John17:3).

The significance of the signs was also addressed in James Montgomery Boice book. He said the purpose of the signs is to bring Christian to the absolute assurance of their salvation. Moreover, his purpose is to lead these to faith which prove that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, that by believing they may have life in his name.

Another strategic purpose why the signs are important to understand John gospel was explicit in John Drane book. He explained the miracles did by Jesus was not for his personal gain, rather for the glory of God which He shared as God`s Son (John 1:14). The same subject happens in other miracles where Jesus requires praise to be given to God and not to himself (John 11:4). Furthermore, he illuminate the demonstration of God`s power by miracles to make known those who witnessed them would realize that the kingdom had arrived with the coming of Jesus. In his further explanation, he said the miracles not only proclaim the appearance of the kingdom only but explained some factual facts which are grouped into three sections; each of these expresses a different aspect of Jesus event. They declare the meaning of the kingdom for individuals, for the world as a whole, and its future consequences and consummation.

Wenham & Walton also expressed the purpose of believe and the significant to understand John Gospel in the view of signs. John depict the primary evidence of selected miracles revealed who Jesus is and reason to believe in him. Thus, revealed His glory and his disciples believed in him. The glory is the divine glory of the only son of God; the miracles are the works of God which should lead to faith (John 2:11; 1:14; 10: 25). The essence of miracles is to see Jesus as God over all and not just to admitted him as Just Man but the very invisible God in the flesh who have the capacity to save the whole creation as John who is the eyes witness had presenting him in his gospel of believe.

John Macarthur made profound statements in his book regarding the manipulation of the fulfilling of the scriptures where an author is trying to prove Jesus made up the fulfilment of the scriptures, He said, “a mere man trying to mislead people could not have had the kind of sovereign control over events Jesus repeatedly displayed”. The seven signs which depict the sovereignty of Jesus over the creation establish the importance and the reason why John Gospel should be understood.

CONCLUSION

Many other signs consequently did Jesus which is not written according to John gospel, but these are written that ye may believe that Jesus is Christ, the Son of God; and believe that ye may have life in his name. In the signs appears the revelation of God; in belief, the reaction that they ought to evoke; in life, the result that belief brings. This statement incorporates the application of the whole gospel.

The text John used in (John 20:30-32) explicate more clues to an understanding of the content of the gospel. The purpose of John gospel and selected signs is to revealed who Jesus is, His sovereignty over all creation and messiah of humanity.

Saint Anthony Of Padua Theology

Saint Anthony is a beloved saint. He devoted his life to the poor and less fortunate, even though he came from a wealthy family. Saint Anthony was born in Lisbon, Portugal on August 15, 1195, to his parents Martin and Theresa de Boullion. This is also the date of our Blessed Mother’s Assumption. At his baptism his mother dedicated him to the Blessed Virgin, and he had a lifelong devotion to our Blessed Mother Mary (Lovasik 3). He was given the name Fernando at baptism (About St. Anthony). Saint Anthony is the patron saint of miracles and of the poor (Craughwell 379; Little, Brown and Company 205).

Saint Anthony started his prayer life early. His parents sent him to a cathedral school for his education. When he turned fifteen, he went to study at the Augustine house of studies, St. Vincent’s Outside the Walls, by Lisbon. St. Anthony joined the community, Canons Regular. He wanted to become a priest, so he stayed there for ten years. He spent two years at St. Vincent’s and he spent eight years at the Monastery of the Holy Cross in Coimbra. He wanted to become a martyr so he became a Franciscan. He took the name Anthony (Lovasik 8). Anthony was often tempted by the devil, but prayed for strength to defeat him. When he was younger, he used to serve the Eucharist at his uncle’s mass at the cathedral. He believed that the Eucharist gave him strength (Lovasik 5, 7, and 9). St. Anthony had a good relationship with St. Francis of Assisi. He met him in Morocco, when his ship got blown off course (Lovasik 11). St Anthony was united with St. Francis’ spirit and God’s wisdom and guidance (Lovasik 16). St. Francis also asked Anthony to do things for him like teach Theology to the St. Francis’ fellow friars. Anthony followed his orders and did so (Lovasik 18).

St. Anthony loved to preach. He preached to the poor and less fortunate. He set his life to preach. Even though he came from a wealthy family, he gave up everything and practiced poverty, so he could preach truly about it (About St. Anthony). When he joined the Franciscan Friars, they soon realized that he preached wonders, so they sent him along to preach his miracles (Craughwell and Haeger 377). He was a gifted preacher. He forgave everyone. St. Anthony drew many crowds filled with less fortunate people, careless people, and even criminals. His sermons usually brought the criminals to confession (Little, Brown and Company 205).

St. Anthony had a hard life because people wanted to hurt him, and he did get hurt along the way. He traveled tirelessly to preach his gift, though he became sick many times. He became very sick with edema and decided go back to Padua, Italy (Catholic Online). On his way there he died. He died on June 13, 1231. He was thirty-six years old. He died from his labors (Craughwell and Haeger 379). It is said that right before he died he cried out, “I see my Lord” (Lovasik 26). In the years after his death he has earned the title “The Wonder-Worker” (Little, Brown and Company 205). St. Anthony has also been called “The Ark of the Testament” and the “Repository of Holy Scripture.” Forty-six miracles were confirmed for his canonization. One reason for St. Anthony becoming the patron saint of lost things is when he lost a book of psalms that had all of his teachings in it. Anthony prayed and prayed for his book to be returned and it was returned by a novice who had stolen it. The book is being kept in the Franciscan friary in Bologna (About St. Anthony). Only two miracles were accomplished during his lifetime (Lovasik 26). St. Anthony’s feast day is June 13, the day he died. Only one year after his death, Pope Gregory IX canonized him as a saint (Craughwell and Haeger 179). In 1946, Pope Pius XII declared him a doctor of the church on January 16 (Catholic Online). That same year that he died, people in Padua built a basilica in honor of St. Anthony. The basilica was finished in the year 1263, thirty-six years after his death. It is reported that about thirty-two years after his death, people found his body totally corrupted. However, his tongue was perfect, moist and filled with color as it was when he was living (Lovasik 28-29). St. Anthony is usually depicted holding an infant. The infant is said to be baby Jesus. St. Anthony was visited by the infant Jesus while he was praying in his cell. The infant smiled at him and held out his arms to St. Anthony. In remembrance of this event St. Anthony is seen with the infant, a lily for innocence, and the Bible representing his teachings (Lovasik 23). People love St. Anthony so much! Many people find St. Anthony an understanding friend. Many pilgrims travel to Padua to St. Anthony’s tomb and pray every year. St. Anthony has also been called the “Saint of the World” (Lovasik 31).

I first heard about St. Anthony in kindergarten when Mrs. Arcuri would call him to find lost things. St. Anthony further piqued my interest when I saw a movie called The Christmas Tree. In the movie a little orphaned girl named Anna is dropped off at a convent where she is raised. Her only possession is her precious satchel. As a teenager, she lost her satchel and is distraught. The sisters tell her to pray to St. Anthony and he would find her satchel. The sisters prayed and prayed to St. Anthony and indeed Anna found her satchel. As a young adult she decided to become a nun and took the name Sister Anthony in gratitude. I admire that he gave up everything to help people that don’t have much or anything at all. He devoted his life to the poor. He tried to live what he preached. St. Anthony is a beloved saint!

Roman Catholic Contemporary Tradition Of Moral Theology Theology Religion Essay

An Introduction to Moral Theology was originally written in December of 1990 by William E. May. It was published by Our Sunday Visitor, Inc. in 1991, just prior to the Encyclical Letter of John Paul II, Veritatis Splendor, which was published in 1994. Later in 1994, May published his revised edition most likely to incorporate and respond to the clarifications provided by Veritatis Splendor. With the second edition, published in 2003, he further expanded his work and provides a very clear and thorough analysis of Christian moral theology.

May maintains a strong emphasis on the Christian moral principles purported by Germain Grisez and his companion moral theologians John Finnis and Joseph Boyle. May maintains fidelity to the Roman Catholic Magisterium and offers a strong foundation that stems from his own expertise including his knowledge of bioethics.

William May is definitely main-stream and possesses a sound and loyal adherence to the post Vatican II reconnection with Aquinian moral principles. If there is a criticism of May’s book, it is that he possesses such a deep and profound understanding of the evolution of modern moral theology, including the myriad of revisionist authors and their various schools of thought, that he is capable and somewhat prone to lose a novice in the complexity. His book may better serve the graduate student who possesses a core understanding of moral theology, rather than the neophyte or liberal arts undergraduate.

May demonstrates repeated loyalty to the theories and teachings of Germain Grisez and often defends them in combination with John Finnis and Joseph Boyle. May, Grisez, Finnis and Boyle have also collaborated in publishing other works. May also brings other authors and theologians into his comparative analysis including: Martin Rhonheimer, Joseph Fuchs, Richard Gula, Charles Curran and Timothy O’Connell among many others. May fearlessly pits their views on moral theology against Aquinas’ Summa , Veritatis Splendor and the documents from Vatican II, especially when sorting out the complex definitions of natural law. Although fearless in his quest for fidelity to Roman Catholic tradition and the Magisterium, he is both thorough and contextually compassionate to the opposing ideas presented by the revisionists and proportionalists, pointing out their positive contributions as well as their serious theological flaws. May is not timid and he quickly rejects their infidelity to the foundational underpinnings of Roman Catholic theology while simultaneously attempting to understand why they have chosen a contrary stance to Aquinas, Veritatis Splendor, or similar post Vatican II magisterial interpretations.

Human Dignity and Free Human Action

In May’s first edition, he listed two kinds of human dignity stating, “According to Catholic tradition, as found in Aquinas and in the teachings of Vatican Council II, there is a twofold dignity proper to human beings: one is intrinsic and an endowment or gift; the other is also intrinsic, but is an achievement or acquisition.” [1] Referring to Dignitatis Humane, which was published in 1965, but more notably, citing Veritatis Splendor, May is motivated to add a third kind of human dignity in his revision that he calls,

[A] purely gratuitous gift from God himself, who gives this to us when, through baptism, we are ‘re-generated’ as God’s very own children and given the vocation to become holy, even as the heavenly Father is holy, and to be co-workers with Christ, his collaborators in redeeming the world. This dignity is a treasure entrusted to us, and we can lose it by freely choosing to do what is gravely evil. [2]

In keeping with his recognized mainstream Roman Catholic theology, May incorporates John Paul II’s renewed focus on moral absolutes, together with the theological virtues presented in Veritatis Splendor, and inculcates this vision into in his two revisions. May was already a proponent of Aquinas and he spends a great deal of time, devoting an entire section of his book on natural law in Aquinas as developed in the Summa Theologiae. He contrasts Aquinas with Ulpian’s definitions of natural law and then focuses on Aquinas’ teaching of natural law in the Summa Contra Gentiles. His Revised Edition adds a section on natural law from Vatican II and then in his Second Edition he also adds sections to his book to include the theology of John Paul II as well as Martin Rhonheimer. May’s theology is strong on moral responsibility and their resulting norms. One example is how he interweaves the teaching on natural law from Aquinas with the theology expressed by Grisez, Boyle and Finnis; concluding, “It is the natural law which is perfected, fulfilled, [and] completed by the evangelical law of love, of a more-than-human kind of love, the love that God himself has for us. [When we are] concerned with our life as moral persons in Christ, we shall seek to know how the evangelical law of love fulfills and completes the natural law.” [3]

As already noted, May is not shy about identifying and attacking the revisionist theologians and pitting them against Veritatis Splendor and the teachings of the Magisterium. He reviews and sheds light upon the writings of a myriad of the post-Vatican II revisionists including: Louis Janssens, Josef Fuchs, Richard Gula, Richard McCormick, Timothy E. O’Connell, Franz Bockle, Charles E. Curran, Bernard Haring, Franz Scholz, Peter Knauer, and Bruno Schuller. May defends moral absolutes using strong and carefully documented arguments as they are described in the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church and Veritatis Splendor by John Paul II. He ultimately concludes,

Revisionists, in their arguments based on the “wholeness” or “totality” of the human act, focus on the agent’s “remote” or “ulterior” end or “further intention,” i.e., on the good that the agent hopes to realize by choosing to do x here and now, or the evil that the agent hopes to avoid by choosing to do x here and now. But they fail to take seriously – indeed, they even ignore – the moral significance of the x that is chosen to realize this end and the fact that the agent freely wills this x as a chosen means, for it is the “proximate” end of his will act and the “present intention” that shapes his moral being. Revisionists are thus led to redescribe human actions in terms of their hoped-for results. [aˆ¦] Secondly, it falsely redescribes actions in terms of their anticipated results and by doing so fails to reveal and at times even conceals what moral agents are in fact choosing and doing [emphasis added]. [4]

On Human Action and Virtue

May provides a solid and clear understanding of human action and free choice. May’s first edition (1991) is virtually void of a discussion on the virtues. He does mention virtues and vices in his section, The Basic Understanding of Law in the Summa Theologiae, but his goal is targeted towards a discussion of goods and habits within Eternal Law and Natural Law. His revised (1994) and second (2003) editions add a section dedicated to the virtues. He reflects on Grisez, Aquinas and their discussion of virtue, but less as an instruction on the virtues and more as a response to Veritatis Splendor’s emphasis on the virtues and their importance and effect on free human action and formation of conscience in the moral life. May has a brief discussion on the Cardinal Virtues and specifically side-steps the Theological Virtues stating,

I will not here consider his [Aquinas’] teaching on the theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity and his teaching that, with charity, God infuses supernatural moral virtues of prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance, etc. These aspects of his teaching are well set forth by Romanus Cessario in The Moral Virtues and Theological Ethics and Virtue or the Examined Life. An excellent brief account of Thomas’s teaching on the virtues can be found in T. C. O’Brien’s article on virtue in the New Catholic Encyclopedia. [5]

Turning then to the Cardinal Virtues, May first reflects on Aquinas’ discussion of appetites and how they contribute to the formation of the Cardinal Virtues. May states,

This text prepares the way for Aquinas’s division of the moral virtues perfecting the appetites into the classical “cardinal” virtues, namely, those of prudence (perfecting one’s practical reason), justice (perfecting the appetite of the will), temperance (perfecting the concupiscible appetite), and fortitude (perfecting the irascible appetite). [6]

In coincidence with and in defense of Germain Grisez, May sees a relationship between moral virtues and moral principles. He finds that a virtue is akin to a good habit, citing fairness and justice, and asserting that one’s personality is affected by each of the commitments and moral norms practiced by that person. May states,

Some today oppose a “virtue-based ethics” to a “normative” or “principle-based ethics.” This debate is in my opinion misplaced. The following passage from Grisez indicates the proper relationship between virtues and moral principles: “What,” he asks, “is the connection aˆ¦ between moral principles and virtues? Do we have two distinct, perhaps even competing, approaches to morality – an ethics of moral truth versus an ethics of virtue? Not at all. Take the Golden Rule. One who consistently chooses fairly and works consistently to carry out such choices is a fair person – a person, that is, with the virtue of fairness or justice. A virtue is nothing other than an aspect of the personality of a person integrated through commitments and other choices made in accord with relevant moral norms derived from the relevant modes of responsibility. In other words: living by the standard of fairness makes a person fair. [7]

This assertion of May also coincides with Veritatis Splendor and how John Paul II views human acts as moral acts and how they express the morality of the individual person. John Paul II states,

Human acts are moral acts because they express and determine the goodness or evil of the individual who performs them. They do not produce a change merely in the state of affairs outside of man but, to the extent that they are deliberate choices, they give moral definition to the very person who performs them, determining his profound spiritual traits. [8]

Natural Law, Central to May’s Moral Theology

William May dedicates his longest chapter (chapter 3, of 55 pages) of his second edition (2003) on natural law. He concentrates on several areas of natural law, including the teachings of Aquinas, Ulpian’s definition, the Summa Contra Gentiles, Vatican II, the teaching of John Paul II, and the theology of Germain Grisez, John Finnis and Joseph Boyle. He also discusses areas of agreement between Rhonheimer and Grisez, Finnis, and Boyle and then turns to areas of disagreement between them and Rhonheimer. Finally he reviews the relationship between natural law and virtue.

Kevin Flannery, who reviewed May’s 1994 revision for The Thomist, agrees and comments, “The core of the book is chapter two in which May discusses the natural law theory of Thomas Aquinas and its development by Grisez, Finnis and Boyle. Anyone interested in a quick, accurate introduction to natural law theory as understood in its central tradition could do no better than to read these 63 pages.” [9]

May’s incorporation of Rhonheimer’s position on natural law did not come until the second edition was published in 2003. The core of his use of Rhonheimer supports Grisez et al. noting that as held by Aquinas, natural law is a work of practical reason. He opposes the moralists that deny moral absolutes and accepts that natural reason naturally apprehends the goods that are to be pursued and done. As May states, “Rhonheimer agrees with Grisez et al. in holding that according to Aquinas – and reality – our knowledge of the truths of natural law is not derived from metaphysics or anthropology or any speculative knowledge. With them, he opposes those who maintain the opposite, explicitly acknowledging his debt to Grisez on this matter.” [10]

Rhonheimer disagrees with Grisez et al. in three major areas stated succinctly by May as, “(a) the distinction between the perceptive-practical and descriptive-reflexive levels of practical reason; (b) the relationship between natural law and virtue; and (c) the movement from the first or common principles of natural law to its ‘proximate’ or ‘immediate conclusions.” [11]

May also notes additional disagreement of Rhonheimer with Grisez et al. and indicates that this is his own opinion as well, noting that Rhonheimer does not show how proximate conclusions are found to be true in light of prior principles. May states,

Rhonheimer does not, however, explicitly show how the primary principles of natural law serve as premises in the light of which one can show the truth of the “proximate and immediate” conclusions. In this, he seems to follow Aquinas himself. As we have seen, Grisez, Finnis, and Boyle argue – correctly in my opinion – that one must show clearly how the so-called “proximate conclusions” are shown to be true in the light of prior principles. [12]

In his revised editions, May includes a concise section on the teaching of John Paul II and most importantly as it is expressed in Veritatis Splendor. May demonstrates that one of John Paul II’s main points is that, in order to respect the dignity of our neighbor, one must refrain from destroying or damaging the goods of our neighbor and even, “cherish the real goods perfective in him.” [13]

In addition and in agreement with Aquinas who states, “Hence it is clear that the goodness of the human will depends much more upon eternal law than upon human reason” [14] , May emphasizes the core of John Paul II’s thoughts on natural law stating, “The highest law is God’s divine, eternal law. The natural law is our human, intelligent participation in this eternal law, which we can come to know through the exercise of our practical reasoning.” [15] May then directs his reader to the Catechism of the Catholic Church (nos. 1950-1960) for further clarity on eternal and natural law. Here, is where the passage referring to Leo XIII, Libertas praestantissimum, 579, is encountered in the Catechism that states,

The natural law is written and engraved in the soul of each and every man, because it is human reason ordaining him to do good and forbidding him to sin… But this command of human reason would not have the force of law if it were not the voice and interpreter of a higher reason to which our spirit and our freedom must be submitted. [16]

According to May’s convincing and methodical presentations, John Paul II, the Second Vatican Council, Grisez et al., Aquinas, and May himself all agree, “natural law that is perfected, fulfilled, and completed by the evangelical law of love, of a more-than-human kind of love, the love that God himself has for us.” [17]

Moral Absolutes and the Battle with the Revisionists

May contested the revisionists long before the appearance of Veritatis Splendor and the re-centering of Catholic moral theology on the precepts of Aquinas. In his 1980 compilation of essays entitled Principles of Catholic Moral Life [18] May, together with William Cardinal Baum, compiled a series of essays that were unequivocally Thomistic and criticized the proportionalist and consequentialist thinking that had developed in several theological circles. In May’s own contribution to the volume, he provided an essay entitled, The natural law and Objective Morality: A Thomistic Perspective. He states, “Today [circa 1979] a significant number of Roman Catholic moral theologians find it necessary to dissent from authoritative teachings of the Roman Catholic Church on moral questions. The Magisterium of the Church teaches that some specifiable sorts of human acts are wicked and contrary to the principles of the natural law.” [19]

According to May, the root cause of the revisionists rejection of moral absolutes stems from the Majority Report which was a document dated, “(27 May 1966) of the ‘majority theologians’ of the Pontifical Commission on Population, Family and Birth, in which they sought to explain why, if contraceptive intercourse is morally good, nevertheless various other masturbatory acts between spouses are not.” [20] May, referring to Documentum Syntheticum, (in Hoyt, p. 72), further highlights the notions of the revisionist theologians of the Majority Report that state, “Infertile conjugal acts constitute a totality with fertile acts and have a single moral specification [namely, the fostering of love responsibly toward generous fecundity].” [21] May points out that the theologians of the Majority Report say,

that the moral “object” of their act – is ‘the fostering of love responsibly toward a generous fecundity.'[They define] this [as] obviously something good, not bad. aˆ¦ Revisionists, aˆ¦ claim that the specific moral absolutes defended in the Catholic tradition and affirmed by the magisterium isolate partial aspects of human acts and, on the basis of such isolated aspects, render decisive moral judgments about them. Their claim is that reason, objectivity, and truth require that an action be evaluated as right or wrong only as a totality that includes all the circumstances and motivations, considered in relation to all the ‘premoral’ (but morally relevant) goods and bads involved in that totality. [22]

May then goes on to show that from this line of thinking the revisionist theologians including those he names: Franz Bockle, Charles E. Curran, Josef Fuchs, Bernard Haring, Louis Janssens, Richard McCormick, Timothy E. O’Connell, Richard Gula, Franz Scholz, and Bruno Schuller, develop the theories of proportionate good, the preference principle, and the denial of moral absolutes. Another group of theologians sometimes called the minority report theologians including Germain Girsez, John Finnis, Joseph Boyle, and others, including William May himself, hold fast to the teachings of Aquinas, and defend moral absolutes. In the 2003 second edition of his book, May also points out that in their understanding of the object of a human act, the minority report theologians coincide with both the Catechism of the Catholic Church and John Paul II in Veritatis Splendor. May clearly states,

With this understanding of the “object” of a human act in mind, it is easy to grasp John Paul II’s conclusion, namely, that “One must reject the thesis, characteristic of teleological and proportionalist theories, which holds that it is impossible to qualify as morally evil according to its species – its ‘object’ – the deliberate choice of certain kinds of behavior or specific acts, apart from consideration of the intention for which the choice is made or the totality of the foreseeable consequences of that act for all persons concerned” [no. 79; cf. no. 82]. [23]

May clearly points out that in Veritatis Splendor, John Paul II refutes the teleologisms of consequentialism and proportionalism declaring that they, “are not faithful to the Church’s teaching when they believe that they can justify, as morally good, deliberate choices of kinds of behavior contrary to the commandments of the divine and natural law'(cf. no. 75).” [24]

Morality and Sin

May focuses on three major areas in his discussion of sin: “(1) the core meaning of sin, (2) the distinction between mortal and venial sin and the basis of this distinction, and (3) the effect of sin on our moral life.” [25]

In his discussion on the core meaning of sin, he turns first to scripture, starting with the Old Testament. According to May, “The Old Testament consistently regards sin as a wicked rebellion against the Lord.” [26] Here he reflects on the words to describe sin such as unfaithfulness, adultery, foolishness, and abomination. Referring to Sirach, May states, “The consistent teaching of the Old Testament is that sin is rooted in human freedom and consists in an abuse of God’s gift of free choice.” [27] He then turns to David and Psalm 51 and highlights what he calls a beautiful summary of sin in the Old Testament with the passage,

Have mercy on me, O God, according to thy steadfast love; according to thy abundant mercy blot out my transgressions (pesha’). Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity (‘awon), and cleanse me from my sin (hatta’ t)! For I know my transgressions (pesha’), and my sin (hatta’t) is ever before me. Against thee, thee only, have I sinned (hatta’), and done that which is evil (ra’) in thy sight (Ps 51: 1-4). [28]

This is the source for the words used by the priest during Mass, when standing at the side of the altar, he washes his hands, saying quietly, “Wash me, O Lord, from my iniquity and cleanse me from my sin.” [29]

Turning to the New Testament, May finds words to describe sin like harmatia and harmatma (freely chosen deeds or to choose to miss-the-mark), anomia (lawlessness), adikia (injustice), and skotos (dimmed eyesight or blindness). For May, these words “show that sin is an opposition to the truth of God, to Jesus Christ – who is the way, the truth, and the life – to one’s fellowmen, and to the truth of being a human person.” [30]

The third area that May discusses in his section on sin is Catholic moral tradition. He reflects on aspects of St. Augustine and Aquinas as well as Gaudium et Spes, and Dignitatis Humanae. He also considers some of the active theologians and their contrary views, including Keane, Curran, Haring, McCormick, and others. True to May’s orthodox view of divine law, he understands that God directs all of creation with charity and wisdom. In this context he concludes,

[T]he highest norm of human life is the divine law – eternal, objective, and universal – whereby God orders, directs, and governs the entire universe and all the ways of the human community by a plan conceived in wisdom and love. [aˆ¦] Man has been made by God to participate in this law, with the result that, under the gentle disposition of divine providence, he can come to perceive ever more increasingly the unchanging truth (Dignitatis humanae, no. 3; cf. Gaudium et spes, nos. 16-17). [31]

May then goes on to unfold a clear and articulate discussion of mortal sin and venial sin. He uses many sources including encyclical and magisterial pronouncements, scripture, council teachings, and especially observations from John Paul II. Within this context, he carefully considers and then clearly rejects the fundamental option theories. Finally, at the end of his chapter on sin, May refers his readers directly to the Catechism of the Catholic Church where he clearly embraces its definitions of sin, including mortal and venial sin, which states,

God has consigned all men to disobedience, that he may have mercy upon all (Rom 11:32). Sin is an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law (St. Augustine, Faust 22: PL 42, 418). It is an offense against God. It rises up against God in a disobedience contrary to the obedience of Christ. Sin is an act contrary to reason. It wounds man’s nature and injures human solidarity. The root of all sins lies in man’s heart. The kinds and the gravity of sins are determined principally by their objects. To choose deliberately-that is, both knowing it and willing it-something gravely contrary to the divine law and to the ultimate end of man is to commit a mortal sin. This destroys in us the charity without which eternal beatitude is impossible. Unrepented, it brings eternal death. Venial sin constitutes a moral disorder that is reparable by charity, which it allows to subsist in us. The repetition of sins-even venial ones-engenders vices, among which are the capital sins. [32]

In his latest (2003) revised edition of An Introduction to Moral Theology, May includes an appendix to his book, Christian Moral Life and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. He refers his readers to the Catechism and this appendix often, pointing out that the prime source for most definitions within moral theology are best sought there.

In his review of May’s book in the New Oxford Review’s, Justin Gullekson agrees with the observations above regarding May’s mainstream Roman Catholic position on sin and states,

Sin and moral absolutes: These topics are taken up [by May] with gusto. The pastor, director of religious education or unsettled lay person will find May’s extensive treatment of these matters helpful, especially because he identifies certain theological positions with their corresponding expositors. This book battles the mess people make of their lives when they have been acting according to the false subjective norms of free choice (“if it feels O.K., do it”) and so-called conscience (“if it’s not a sin for you, it’s no sin”). [33]

Jesus Christ, Our Moral Foundation

May points out that Jesus Christ is central and foundational in Christian morality. He supports this with sections from Gaudium et Spes, Veritatis Splendor, scripture (especially from Paul’s letters), and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. As he often does throughout his book, May then turns to articulated positions from Germain Grisez. He points to Grisez’s threefold understanding of how Jesus divinizes humanity, producing union with God. The first is, “our union with him in divine life as children of God, [the second is] the bodily union between Jesus and his faithful, the members of his Church [and the third is] unity between Christ and the Christian in human acts.” [34]

The sacraments, and especially the Eucharist within the Mass and Baptism are central to one’s union with Christ and humanity’s sharing in His sanctifying grace. The Mass is fully a participation in Christ’s act of salvation and Baptism is the bestowal of one’s vocation to not only be within God’s family and a member of the Mystical Body of Christ, but also to assume a greater responsibility to live a moral life as a member of His Mystical Body.

In alignment with Aquinas, Veritatis Splendor, and Grisez, May turns to a discussion of the beatitudes, and how they provide, “modes of Christian response [to] specify ways of acting that mark a person whose will, enlivened by the love of God poured into his or her heart, is inwardly disposed to act with confidence aˆ¦” [35]

May turns again to Grisez. Here he enfolds the gifts of the Holy Spirit as found in Isaiah with the beatitudes producing eight “modes of Christian response” [36] as follows,

1. To expect and accept all good, including the good fruits of one’s work, as God’s gift – [aˆ¦]

2. To accept one’s limited role in the Body of Christ and fulfill it – [aˆ¦]

3. To put aside or avoid everything which is not necessary or useful in the fulfillment of one’s personal vocation – [aˆ¦]

4. To endure fearlessly whatever is necessary or useful for the fulfillment of one’s personal vocation – [aˆ¦]

5. To be merciful according to the universal and perfect measure of mercy which God has revealed in Jesus – [aˆ¦]

6. To strive to conform one’s whole self to living faith, and purge anything which does not meet this standard – [aˆ¦]

7. To respond to evil with good, not with resistance, much less with destructive action – [aˆ¦]

8. To do no evil that good might come of it, but suffer evil together with Jesus in cooperation with God’s redeeming love -. [37]

By digesting the beatitudes in this way, using Grisez’s thoughts, May demonstrates how, in essence, the beatitudes are actually moral foundational norms or virtues for humanity provided directly by Christ.

The Church, Teacher of the

Rituals In Religion For Ancient Rome Theology Religion Essay

Religion can be simplified as a belief or the faith that is believed to aid people in the problems of life. The beliefs are organized in relation to humanity and the spiritual world. In every ‘religion in the world’ there are narrative, symbols, traditions and even histories that explain the religion belief. Each religion tries to give a meaning to life as well as explain the origin of life and the universe. Religions matters include rituals, sermons and even commemoration which differ from one religion practice to the other (Adkins & Roy, 274). They define this through their religious scriptures and holy places.

Religion in Ancient Rome was so intense the Romans regarded it, as theirs. They (Romans) also regarded themselves highly in terms of religion. They even attribute their success in the world to the unity and good relation with their gods. Historically, their leaders claimed to be in direct negotiations with their gods. ‘This in turn’ made religion among Romans to be a hugely significant aspect. They did all they had to be identified religiously. The leaders were supposed to identify in terms of religion, and they mostly used to be the pontiffs. There is acutely much in the religion of the Romans and the way they carried out their religious practices. The Roman religion was something that was termed as practical and contractual. It was mainly based on knowledge, and the practice of prayer rituals and the sacrifices offered and not based on faith.

Rome is thought to be the source of the religion particularly the catholic practice. However other communities in the world had their own beliefs and practices not to mention their religions. However, the Roman Empire is thought to have contributed to significant changes in other religions of the world. What is the impact of religion and rituals in the ancient Rome?

The godaa‚¬a„?s and goddesses of Rome were identified with the cities and lives in each of the cities. The gods lead people as they were consorted before any actions. They were offered sacrifices frequently in order to please them. The roman religious attitudes resulted to the state cult and influence on political as well as military events. Family heads were responsible in overseeing domestic rituals and players. In the Roman Empire, the issues to do with the religion were left in the hands of the state officials and not in the individuals care. During the ancient times in Rome there existed a number of religious posts where each one of them served a pivotal role in the organization (Rupke, 259). The early times in the roman religion, it was based on spirits and the people did not build mythologies like their Greek counterparts as they believed everything had spirit. The spirits were held responsible for any good or evil in the communities. This obliged the Romans to keep the spirits happy through various worshipping and sacrifice offering to them. Proper performance of the rituals and the sacrifices was believed to keep the gods happy.

The Romans had a practical approach to the issue of religion. This explained why they had a number of gods rather than believe in one powerful god. Their religion was not centrally originating or believed but was comprised of a number of rituals, superstitions and taboos. There also contained different traditions ‘which were collected from different sources over time’. Their religion was less spiritual but a relationship with external forces that they believed controlled their existence and well being. Various Origins are credited for the roman religion. Several gods and goddesses were bled for several religious influences. Many of these came via the Greek colonies from the southern part of Italy. Other had their origin from the old religions that existed in society. For example, they had a god known as Diana which was believed to originate from Latin.

Many of the rituals and the sacrifices made by the Romans were done as per their belief that the gods and the goddesses needed to be pleased. They also prayed for them to have the good fortune in their actions. Therefore, sacrificial offerings were made to the roman gods. These sacrifices were specific and were highly respected in the society as well as highly ritualized. For example, the sex of animal sacrificed was supposed to correspond with the sex of the goddess or the gods to whom the sacrifice was meant for (Browne, 86). The upper gods were offered white animals and the black ones were offered to the underworld gods. There were public, and even private offerings done statues were erected along the streets and market places. Some of the sacrifices made during games, ceremonies, altar among others. The five posts (Vestal virgins, pontiffs, Haruspex, Flamens Augurs) formed the basis for the sacrifices made by the Romans. Each of the post had a meaning in the Roman Empire. Pontiffs were the advisors to the magistrates the Haruspex was a priest who was greatly regarded in the society and he was for predicting the future. The Augars were used to tell whether the gods were in support of any of the government action. The vestal virgins were never to let out the flame as their duty was to guard the sacred fire. They were also supposed to bake the sacred salt cake for use in a number of ceremonies. They were supposed to remain virgins (Browne, 90).

The Roman calendar contained months and corresponding festivals. I.e. each month had festivals that were in honor of their gods. They were comprised of sober, joyful and dignified events. For example in the month of February, people were given 9 days to worship their dead ancestors, at this time businesses were closed, and no marriages were allowed as well as closing of the temples. A number of festivals followed where each occasion had a meaning to the Romans. Religion in the ancient roman religion was incorporated together with the state in their belief system. For example, a sacrifice to the gods or an oath was legally binding.

Despite the strict following of religion by the Romans, the survival of religion depended on renewal and also affirmation of their beliefs as time changed as also the social and the attitude changes. Their beliefs were on unconnected traditions where many of them came from Greek rather than Italian foundation. As they lacked core basis of their beliefs, other religions found it easy to establish themselves in the Rome. Some of the cults that managed to find their way into Roman Empire are religions such as the goddess Cybele and Isiris and Osiris from Egypt (North, 44). The initial roman religion continued to be undermined by the increasing impact of the Greek philosophy such as the stoicism which in itself taught that there was a single god.

As I summarize, it is clear that the issue of religion in the ancient Rome was rather municipal and not personal. When this is compared to today’s Christianity, it is different. This is because ‘in Christianity’ god is worshiped from the people’s love and the trust they have for him rather than fear as shown by the Romans in the ancient times. The roman took part in offerings to their gods as well as making sacrifices. They went ahead and established family religious practices which were carried out in their homes. They had a number of god and goddesses whom they believed were responsible for watching and take care of them if they treated them in accordance. This explains why the Romans performed the rituals and the actions they did.

The roman religion was defined by a set of rules and rituals that were performed in the community. As seen, the religion community, tradition and the community prescribed the rituals that were to be performed at any given time. ‘As time moved on there were changes and people could choose the religious group to follow from different groups that existed. The groups came in between the time of Caesar and Augustine who ruled in the 4th and 5th centuries’ respectively. The impact of religion in the Roman Empire was felt all over the nation. However, from the incoming religious believes the Romans adopted a number of them and followed them. This left the Romans divided as they did into have their own established religion (Warrior, 7). In the ancient times, religion was interconnected with politics, and it is the politicians who taught the religion as it was treated to be a public matter and not at the individual level. In addition to this, they performed rituals, which were a sign of believers and dedication to their gods and goddesses. From the case of Roman religion, it is clear that various rituals were performed which were pivotal in the interaction between the people and the gods/goddesses. Rituals were marked by several event celebrations and public events.

Rituals And Beliefs In Venezuela

In Venezuela and around the world has had been developed endless medical specialties, psychological, science and technology very rapidly, in the same way and nearly at the same speed, also, has emerged a large number of beliefs, myths, religions that each day rises with a booming effect. In fact, in the XXI century these religions, beliefs and superstitious practices, such as witchcraft, they manifest themselves with a large number of followers and/or curious people that are consulted with the idea that the shaman, medium or wizard help them to solve their problems, whether physical, mental, economic or any other nature.

Some people queried for evil or revenge from others who according to them are the responsible to the origin of the conflict, and then there are those still without ever having attended a witchcraft ritual or religion and they are usually followers of Christianity or Catholicism, those people express to believe or to be under the effects of a “work” of magic and / or sorcery, or have a firm belief that witchcraft is real and something to be fear of. We often hear from these people phrases like ‘I don’t believe in witches, but if there are, there are,’ or ‘with the Saints do not play’ (referring to Santeria which is a syncretic cult of witchcraft).

Santeria: A religion that combines beliefs of the Yoruba and Bantu people of Southern Nigeria, Senegal, and the Guinea coast with elements of Roman Catholicism, with roots in the Caribbean.

Donnelly (2005:65) explains how in this century Venezuelans ‘increasingly break with a series of taboos imposed from the Spanish conquest about customs and religion’, which opens a new door to the practice of rituals, spiritualism and occultism, being a heritage of ancestors, natives and slaves of the past. This cultural legacy, talking about occultism, rites and religions intermingle to combine religion, magic, occultism, between the sacred and pagan, between the rational and irrational, is to give a deeper meaning to life or tangible and its problems, is to looking for a closer God and not abstract or distant one. (Marin,1986:27).

Because many of the religious practices and beliefs are transmitted by oral tradition, such as Santeria, they have not established a clear basis; in fact many of these religions and pseudo religions are characterized by a complex process of syncretism that even today continues.

According Gruson (1970:34), the most popular religion is Catholicism, where 80 percent of the population consider themselves Catholic, whether or not they are participants. The faithful believe in God, but he is far from this world, the rites are directed towards the saints, the Virgin and the Souls who are closer to the humans. Religion provides the afflicted people the solution of many problems, including physical and mental health; also it has recreational purposes (dances, parties), psychological (ego gratification, when a person has an important position in the ritual organization), social (cronyism) and medicinal (miracle cures).

Popular religions believe in nature spirits and other supernatural entities, ghosts and miraculous goblins, this is considered Catholic and does not cause damage to the basic structure of religion. Private rites are secrets, they are done in time of crisis, performed with a single purpose, but the intention is to alleviate the problem of the client or do evil, while the public rites are rather linked to official Catholicism.

A mixture between paganism and sacred characterizes popular Catholicism. The rituals and symbols of Catholicism often have a different meaning for members of the educated classes than lower class or humble peasants. Catholics go to church, but also they practice rites of Santeria at spiritualist centres, at the same time they may visit the graves of “folk saints”, spiritual healers or get a consultation via Internet. Even in most TV channels is possible to watch programs of cartomancy, tarot, among others, with a considerable rating, over 7%. (IBOPE AGB Venezuela, 2010).

For example, baptism is considered a rite that protects the newborn against all evil influences; the cross for example, contains powers to ward off evil spirits. Although the Christianization of the Indians and black slaves during the colonial era, many concepts and oldest religious practices were preserved, which could flourish outside of official Christianity, all this is embedded so strong on this culture, that some medical professionals recommend the use of spell against the evil eye and shingles (sufferings of religious connotation) (Molina,1947:90-110).

There is no evidence of serious or reflective studies regarding the present topic, but it is interesting to note that religious and pagan is widespread in this country, rituals of witchcraft, sorcery, popular religiosity and Catholic beliefs has been mixed together; among the most common are Nigerian Santeria or traditional and Cuban santeria (Martin, 1983:74).

The practice of psychotherapy in Venezuela is new, there are very few professionals in the country and it is not specifically regulated by any entity, except the Venezuelan Association of Psychotherapist (AVEPSI), located in the capital city Caracas and formed in 2009.

The practice of this specialty in Venezuela is highly welcomed by the general public, but a continuous education and feedback from the therapist towards the client and vice versa, in areas such as clinical hypnosis, beliefs in the supernatural, myths and rituals are necessary. The therapist may face a diversity of situations, similar to those faced Carl Jung and referred in his thesis “On the Psychology and Pathology of So-Called Occult Phenomena” (1902) in which he describes a young woman apparently suffering supernatural attacks.

According to the previous explanation, surges a need to do a study that lead to answer the following question:

Does beliefs; religious or esoteric practices of Venezuelans influence the psychotherapeutic practice in Venezuela?

From the above question arise the following objectives:

General objective

Describe the influence of religions, beliefs, magic and witchcraft in the practice of psychotherapy in Venezuela

SPECIFIC OBJETIVES

Identify religious beliefs, magic or witchcraft on patients attending psychotherapeutic consultation.

Estimate approximately the practice of religious rituals, magic or witchcraft in clients attending to psychotherapeutic consultation.

Recognize the efficiency of Psychotherapy Techniques in the treatment of clients with religious tendencies or witchcraft practitioners.

CHAPTER I
Theoretical Framework
Rites and Beliefs in Venezuela

Some scholars take the practice of witchcraft in Venezuela as somewhat folkloric (Cazabone, 2009:89) unlike other countries where some rites have diabolical connotations with animal sacrifices involved.

This folkloric aspect is closely linked with the Venezuelan humorous character, who in general do not take very seriously the powers of magic; the ‘just in case’, or ‘I don’t believe in witches, but if there are, there are’, gives a sense of belief in certain aspects in the ‘occult’.

Branch (in Zalazar et al, 2001:67) concluded that this Venezuelan way of be is a historic stereotype, derivative from miscegenation and the character of the participants on it, highlighting the ingenuity of indigenous, the hard labour of black workers and the conqueror’s arrogance. These archetypes explains Branch, “play an important role to explaining the Venezuelan people characteristics “, concluding that the Venezuelan broadly is cheerful and humorous by its black and Spanish heritage, smart for his Spanish and Indian roots, loving and generous the Indian heredity, but by the other hand, the negative side, lazy by the Indian essence, disorganized and wasteful by their black ancestry, disrespectful to the law and violent by the Spanish origin, nevertheless none of these influences have or are backed by scientific evidence, ‘are simply social images that continue to be relevant’ (Zalazar et al, 2001:89).

Moreover, beliefs and magic-religious practices are a privileged means to express realities, conflicts, emotions and hidden feelings, taking place beyond the ability to be rational.

Christian (2009:30-45) explains that ‘a great number of people light candles to different deities (Black First, Philip Black, Guaicaipuro, Maria Lionza, etc.) In order they may grant miracles or favours’.

This use of gadgets is a psychological strategy, Figueroa (2005:82) explains that humans use to control their lives and overcome their limitations in an environment that sometimes exceeds his capacity for understanding and action.

Moreover, the use of talismans and / or amulets or just called “vulture seed”, the “aloe plant” are used in rituals and cults as a means of protection or lucky charms.

Cabazone (2009:97) describes that the leader and ex-president Romulo Betancourt said with an air of certainty that ‘his pipe was put under spell by a witch, and many believed that this was the key to its success’. Magic and all its techniques is one of these resources and sometimes this faith on a ritual or belief generates spectacular solutions.

Figueroa (2005:89) suggest, that the use of talismans and amulets dates from the ancient times and worldwide great men, politicians, artists, soldiers, athletes, etc., have behaved and carry symbols of good luck, giving high regard to the power of positive suggestion, so have been able to accomplish their purposes. The psychological effect makes believers to have faith on the amulet, rite, or talisman.

The role of religion in Venezuelan culture and beliefs

As discussed, the cultural background and miscegenation have been influential in Venezuelan culture, even on the whole Latin America despite an apparent secularization.

Notably, worldwide, all cultures of the world were shaped by religion, no one ethnic group escapes this process and on the same area, magical religious traditions and customs have influenced significantly in social relationships, community life and moral codes, ‘this faith in supernatural beings is evident not only in Venezuela but throughout the world’ (Pollak-Eltz, 2004:69).

In Venezuela and throughout Latin America, Catholicism, shaped the culture that until recently had absolute monopoly; all social classes were influenced. Today the official and popular religions are expressions of different types of lifestyles, on the one hand, traditional or popular religiosity has curative and magical and is generally practiced by popular sectors and secondly official Roman Catholicism practiced by people in urban areas.

In this sense, the proliferation of rites and beliefs and personal interpretations of followers and practitioners and the lack of a defined priestly liturgy make these practices and cults an easy target of charlatans and abusers.

Among the most popular cults is that of Maria Lionza, in which the medium is “possessed” he or she fall in trance (matter) and them the spirit that possesses the person is consulted and this gives advice to the person seeking help. The cult of Maria Lionza is complex and covers all magical and religious beliefs of Venezuelan people and forms a synthesis of magical practices, within a religious context. (Pollak-Eltz, 2004:82).

Can be said that this is a syncretic cult with “practical” solutions through rituals that recognize the values of Christianity, in fact, Maria Lionza is sometimes identified with the Virgin of Coromoto and/or an indigenous spirit.

Magic is present on this cult and its techniques are neither good nor bad, but can be used for do good or evil. Wizards pretend to manipulate those forces and claim to possess supernatural and extraordinary powers to communicate with the supernatural world (matter).

Pollak-Eltz (2004:83) states that ‘Faith is the cause of miracles’. Because these techniques can be learnt, the magician is not responsible for acts performed; he or she is an officer to whom the client pays their services. This magician or medium often has the knowledge to solve problems and cure diseases, and is an excellent psychologist despite his limited formal education.

According Pollak-Eltz (2004:106) or pagan religion of witchcraft was faded from the countryside to the cities. This culture is broadly Christian and despite advances in technology and medicine is popular religiosity more alive than ever, and that’s because the popular religion is utilitarian, giving spiritual support and serves as a psychological calming in times of personal crisis.

Saignes (in Pollak-Eltz 2004:65), states that ‘Historically, whites and slaves used to consult black healers that often had more success than white surgeons in healing the sick. Their knowledge on medicinal plants and magical rites brought a increased the prestige of the African medicine-men’.

This figure of the magician or sorcerer could be seen as the representation of an idol, which has the privilege to channel and guide the prosperity or misfortune at will of others.

This is reflected according to Rojas (2006:30), in the particular character of Venezuelan people when they worship a person or religious figure on which can be trusted and surrender.

Popular Religion

The misfortunes and influence that the church had in the 19th and 20th has no relevance in how Venezuelans built his ideas about faith and deities. Since colonial times, this unique blend between religion and popular religion came framed on a profound mystery of the supernatural and esoteric (Gackstetter et al, 2010:45).

There is a term called “The three powers”, has nothing to do with the Catholic Trinity. Maria Lionza is symbolized as the Virgin Mary, these represent the three main components of the country identity, in other words, European, African and indigenous. On this court of spirits enters Simon Bolivar (liberator of Venezuela from Spanish rule) Andres Bello, Negro Felipe (First Black, a black slave who was also murdered by the colonists), Negra Matea (Bolivar’s nanny), Jose Gregorio Hernandez and other Catholic saints.

The cult of Maria Lionza is not a religion guided or hierarchical; the shaman or mediums simply ask questions to the believers about their families, problems, disputes, financial problems, or medical problems. Sometimes people who seek help and have a relative in jail, seek help from Juan Vicente Gomez, those political questions do through Simon Bolivar. Believers generally have a high intensity of spiritual devotion, and made a pilgrimage to Sorte Mountain (near Chivacoa in Yaracuy State) with the belief that the goddess will solve the situation or mishap.

Believers choose a corner in the woods or a bend in the river to build an altar from which invoke, this is called portals. Usually is decorated with photographs, figures and figurines, glasses with rum or brandy, cigars, cigarettes cross, flowers and fruits.

There are several versions of this legend. One of them says that a green-eye Indian woman called Yara was baptized as Maria del Prado of Talavera de Niva. The Cacique Yaracuy sent her to the mountains where it is said she rode on an ounce (leopardus pardali). So Mary was called ‘the Onza’ and then Maria Lionza. It is believed that her cult was born of devotion to the forces of nature and the spirits of the rivers, jungles and caves.

Maria Lionza is part of a “trinity” along with Guaicaipuro, an Indian chief murdered by the Spanish colonists, and Negro Felipe. These three saints are the leading figures of the cult and lead several “courts” of lesser deities. These courts are:

The Indian Court led by Maria Lionza and composed of many Venezuelan Indian chiefs.

The Medical Court led by Jose Gregorio Hernandez and composed of many other famous doctors.

The Court of the Juans made up by a number of figures belonging to Venezuelan folklore.

The Teachers’ Court led by Andres Bello and some other authors.

The Black and African Court, led by popular black figures of Venezuelan history such as La Negra Matea (who was a slave to the Bolivars and nanny of Simon Bolivar), and El Negro Primero (Pedro Camejo) who was known as Negro Primero because he was black and also among the first to go into combat.

The Celestial Court composed of a number of Catholic saints.

The Political Court, which includes Simon Bolivar.

The Court of Malandros, made up of deceased criminals.

The Viking Court, with various of the important Viking chiefs.

Maria Lionza has had a great social and cultural significance that transcends their followers. Her cult was unveiled outside Yaracuy to the 50s of last century, when in 1953 during the tenure of General Marcos Perez Jimenez, the sculptor Alexander Hill (1901-1953) built the famous sculpture of Maria Lionza on a Tapir, (Tapirus terrestris), which has been for over 50 years on the Eastern Freeway in Caracas. On this cult nothing is written, is transmitted orally from generation to generation (cited in http://www.rnw.nl/espanol/video/cultos-populares-venezuela-adoraci%C3%B3n-de-mar%C3%ADa-lionza., 2021).

Most relevant Churches and cults in Venezuela

Among religious organizations and cults largest in the country are:

(source: Directorate of Religious Affairs of the Ministry of Justice in Venezuela,1989).

1. Protestant or Evangelical: After the “Diet of Speyer* or Diet of Spires protest in 1529, there was no intention of proselytizing in Latin America, neither to the evangelizing mission. The main interest was focused only on the Reformation, which resulted that Protestantism could not take root in Latin America until the mid-nineteenth century with little success. However, over the years the indicators have changed, even the statistics of late twentieth century are really growing not only in terms of evangelical denominations but also on other spiritualistic denominations. They are grouped into the following:

a. Anglicanism.

b. Presbyterian Church

c. Lutheran Church.

d. Baptists.

e. New Tribes Mission.

*Diet of Speyer or Diet of Spires refers to any of the sessions of the Imperial Diet of the Holy Roman Empire, of which 50 took place between 838 and 1570 in the city of Speyer (Spires), now in Germany. The most famous sessions occurred in 1526 and 1529 (Wikipedia 2011).

2. Confederate Evangelicals: Religious currents coming from the United States and has Christian connotations.

3. The Pentecostals: They represent a rapidly growing movement with unique characteristics. This religious movement is marked by Methodism and the American Baptists. Pentecostals came to Venezuela in 1940, and its founder the Rev. Irvin Olson, an American Baptist who chose Barquisimeto as pilot center to establish the first “Assembly of God” in Venezuela. Then extend his work to Caracas the capital city and Falcon.

4. Pseudo Christian religion or Millennialists: These religions tend to grow easily. They have in common that their founders made a personal interpretation of the Bible, creating a new dogma around it, which means, to give different meaning to the tradition, followers believe to have the absolute truth (Mangas and Montero, 2001:110).

In Venezuela there are three organizations: The Seventh-day Adventist Church (SDA), Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons, the latter without registration within the Directorate of Justice and Religion.

a. Seventh-day Adventists Church.

b. Jehovah’s Witnesses.

c. Mormons.

5. Spiritual Centre: Its the Venezuelan significant inclination toward the esoteric, rituals and astral. It is not based on beliefs but on personal needs.

This conciliation between the sacred and the profane has its essence in animism and polytheism primitive Strengthened by the African Christian cult with an apparent institutionalism. The Indians embraced the faith of the Catholic Church, but the survival of their beliefs and their closeness to the African slaves produced that Kind of new beliefs.

5.1. The popular indigenous court: This tendency is associated to aboriginal elements. For example, the Indian man thought on the power of natural phenomena, on the stones, lakes, rivers, and the acquisition of that supernatural power conceived by their gods. These beliefs were transmitted to subsequent generations and were fed by transcultural elements including Santeria and Spiritualism. There is no hierarchy that identifies these elements on the contemporary society. What for the Indian was a deity for the healer now is a means of economic livelihood and it is seen as a company with excellent clientele.

5.2. Spiritualists: Along with santeria, this is one of the most advanced forms of mysterious beliefs based mostly on spiritualism of Allan Kardec, French teacher and educator. He is known today as the systematizer of Spiritism for which he laid the foundation with the five books of the Spiritist Codification. It is believed that Spiritism entered to our country under the influence of immigrants from Brazil and Colombia, product of oil fever.

There is no hierarchy around which are organized. The chief head leads the worship and is invoking otherworldly beings, becoming the medium and are called to perform miracles, healings, among others of its kind.

5.3. Santeria: This form of religion is more complex than others. There is a mix of indigenous elements with spiritualist elements, African and Christian origining a semi-organized hybrid. This religion takes the structure of an ancient African tribal religion of the coast of Nigeria, and has three priestly orders: the babalaos, the Orishas ministers and priests of a particular deity. African slaves brought this religion and their main centres are in Brazil, Cuba, and Haiti, subsequently gaining followers in Colombia and Venezuela (Gonzalez-Wippler, 1989:45).

The Santeria in Venezuela have made an even greater mixture, they have found an equivalence between the African gods with Catholic saints, so, for example, Chango (god of lightning and thunder) has its equivalent on Santa Barbara, Oshun (river goddess) at Nuestra Senora de la Caridad del Cobre (Our Lady of Charity of Copper) and so on, giving a deity character to popular saints like Jose Gregorio Hernandez, Maria Lionza, Negro Felipe, among many others.

To the priests formation a kind of tutor is assigned, who is responsible to teach the apprentice all mysteries and then a new priest is ordained. They prepare their ceremonies at sites near rivers or on a mountain as located at Sorte, Yaracuy. Once ordained, the priest is ready to heal, and to remove evils spirits, that acording to them are the ones who tie the individual. Constants pilgrimages are made from inside the country to Sorte Mountain. There are transport companies that offer their services to the mountain, plus a large number of ordained priests, commonly called doctors or sorcerers, who organize these trips from their centres. It will be noted that trade (merchandising) around these cults is prosperous (consultations, travel, esoteric products, candles, text, perfumes, etc).

5.4. The cult of Maria Lionza: The cult of Maria Lionza comes to represent the formation of a Venezuelan indigenous religion with elements of other cultures, in which prevails the origing of the worship of a deity indigenous enriched with African’s religious culture and spiritualism.

6. Sects

6.1. The Moonies: The name usually are due to its founder Sun Myung Moon, born in North Korea in 1920. The organization has the official name of “Association for the Unification of World Christianity” (AUCM) and aims to create a society based on the seeding of spiritual values and on the driving of the family towards real peace.

6.2. Scientology: Its founder is the American Lafayette Ron Hubbard (1911-1986), a specialist in 25 professions in which stand out those of the writer of science fiction (65millones of copies sold of the book “The Way to Happiness” and screenwriter) . The church is considered a company in all aspects. They have a very distinct structure. Its principles are based on the “Dianetics” which consists of the individual healing itself freeing the enslaved spirit. The procedure to achieve this end is by attending sessions called “audition” where the individual is subjected to purification by employing a tool called “electropsychometer” device that detects areas of spiritual distress. This method is progressive. The initiate discards their old beliefs and acquires new rules that he/she must comply according with the amount of promotions obtained.

6.3. Eastern Syncretism: Unlike the animadversion generated in Venezuela during a good part of twentieth century the sects, today are accepted and a significant number of Venezuelans profess parallel and simultaneously in their religion some of these beliefs. It is common to hear things like this: “I am a Catholic but I received the tao” or “I am a Catholic but I like going to the talks of Buddhist metaphysics.” All this is due to the openness of the Eastern sects who reconciled Christianity with their religious precepts and the openness of Venezuelan society to allow several beliefs coexist with both.

The use of ritual in psychotherapy as a tool for change

The use of rituals is an effective tool in some patients on the practice of psychotherapy in Venezuela and is often the only way to convince the patient that his mind can be healed, free from beings, spirits, influences, or spells that threatening the physical and mental health of the person.

The ritual was always an issue discussed by anthropologists who have described the customs and rituals of peoples and communities. Its therapeutic efficacy for change has been described by many clinicians in systemic literature (Ochoa de Alda, 1995:89).

Notably rituals are not heritage of therapists, but procedures of the peoples, families and cultures. An important point is that, in practice as therapists, it should take into account the importance of these phenomena on individuals and families who participate in these traditions (and any other), and knowing these procedures, that are made spontaneously it may arise new ideas for generating alternatives that can be used on a therapeutic context, in order to try to encourage changes that help to get a more adaptive performance, not symptomatic, of families and individuals who, because of their suffering, come to seek therapy. In addition, and of course, as an element well worked, can provide substantial information, especially relational.

In psychotherapy is considered that a ritual includes a set of actions and / or symbolic interactions more or less structured, they are not restricted only to the completion ceremony, but include the entire process of preparation, the implementation experience and reintegration back to everyday life (Rappaport, 1971:12).

A ritual must be composed of the following elements: symbols, open and closed parts and the need to be developed in a space and in a special time (Whiting, 1991:56). The symbols or symbolic actions are the minimum element would constitute a ritual. The link to the meaning of the symbol that appears is usually a personal construction, family or social. Besides rituals symbols consist of open parts and closed parts together. The enclosed parts are the parts of unchanging ritual common to all performing the ritual, these parts provide the minimum structure rigid enough to reassure strong emotional components, transmit important values and give concrete form to the shares. Instead open parts provide sufficient flexibility for each of the participants in the ritual hand contribution to personal and idiosyncratic experience. In the rituals with an important cultural root is usually prescribed by tradition the place and time that will be the realization of the ceremony.

The symbols or symbolic actions are the minimum element that would constitute a ritual. The link of the symbol regarding to the meaning that appears is usually a personal construction, family or social. Besides symbols, the rituals consist of open parts and closed parts that are joined. The closed parts are the parts of unchanging ritual common to everyone who is performing the ritual, these rigid parts provide the minimum structure enough to bring security against strong emotional components, transmit important values and give concrete form to the actions. Instead open parts provide sufficient flexibility for each of the participants in the ritual and the possibility that each one can make his/her contribution according their personal and idiosyncratic experience. The rituals, which have an important cultural root, are usually performed following the tradition, on the place and time specific to the achievement of the ceremony.

Type of rituals

Rites of passage or transition rituals: described in 1909 by A. Van Gennep. These rituals are performed in the transitions experienced by individuals and groups throughout the life cycle, marking the end of a stage of development and the beginning of a new one. Van Gennep after studying various cultures argues the universality of such rituals.

Continuation: rites of intensification. Unlike the transition rituals that are usually performed only once in life of every individual, continuity rituals are executed repeatedly, their purpose is to set the pace of life and maintain continuity, normality within each stage of life cycle.

Healing rituals: This would include the rituals performed to cure, heal and keep out certain diseases.

Therapeutic Rituals: This includes rituals developed by therapists and used in psychotherapeutic practice, nevertheless psychotherapy may be considered in some cases as a ritual. Haley (1973) considered the treatment that is carried out to treat certain problems and that arise in adolescence (psychosis, behavioural disorders, anorexia…) is like an initiation ritual, through which it promotes individuality and necessary emancipation required from the young, as a way to restore him or her to a normal life cycle.

Functions of rituals:

Ochoa De Alda (1995:56) explains that the main functions that meet the rituals described in the life of societies, peoples, families and individuals are:

Rituals make life predictable, providing a sense of belonging to the group that affects the sense of identity of individuals that form it. Rituals, does order and regulate the social functioning, confirming the social structure, while promoting an evolution in this with minimal conflicts.

Another primary function is the transmission of culture, values and lasting norms. By one hand, it does create a sense of solidarity, cohesion and continuity in groups, and on the other hand, contribute significantly to the creation of the belief systems of a group (Van der Hart, Voogt and Witzum, 1989:56).

The traditional rituals not only channelled social coordination between individuals, families, communities and villages in the here and now, but also between the past, present and future represented by the different generations (Davis, 1987:67).

The rituals of transition, allow passing from one stage to other on the life cycle. Its first element of action does that roles, relationships, and world standards are modified during their execution (Davis, 1987:78). Admitting that any transition is to a greater or lesser extent an imbalance, ritual ceremonies

Ascension Catholic Church Visit

The Ascension Catholic Church is located in 2950 North Harbor City Blvd Melbourne Florida. The close proximity of the church from my home enabled me make a visit to the church last Sunday for the morning mass at 9.30 am. My neighbor who is a member of the church had earlier invited me to visit the church with him on Wednesday evening. He further informed me of the church’s dressing code and even suggested that I accompany him to the church. However, since I wanted to get more exposure I declined this offer. Instead, we resolved to attend the Sunday service since it had higher attendance from the congregation (Ascension Catholic Community1).

The Ascension Catholic Church is a member of the Diocese of Orlando that consists of other churches within Florida. The church is located in a serene environment that makes it an ideal location for worship. The actual church building has a sitting capacity of approximately one thousand two hundred people. On the right at the entrance, I dipped my finger and made a sign of the cross on my forehead in a holy water font. My neighbor friend informed me that the father had blessed the water and this is used as reminder of baptism. It further signifies respect as one enters into the house of God amongst Catholic faithful. The same routine is repeated as faithful exit the church (Ascension Catholic Community1).

History of the church and nature of worshippers

I was welcomed into the church by members of the welcome team who usher in new parishioners and orient them into the church. This greatly uplifted my spirits and I felt appreciated and recognized by the church. The congregation at Ascension Catholic Church varies widely representing all ethnicities and age groups of the community. The church has therefore created several masses to cater for all groups of the congregation. The church has further created special categories of the congregation ranging from pre- schoolchildren to junior high schools and teenagers. The adult population consists of special interest outreach groups that cater for disadvantaged members of the society such as the deaf (Ascension Catholic Community1).

The deaf ministry for instance, holds special meetings with those with hearing impairments to encourage and nurture them spiritually. In addition, the job seeker ministry consoles those who have lost employment while also helping them in searching for other alternative sources of income. The Vietnamese community on the other hand, helps immigrants to settle comfortably in America. There is also a community of Hispanic Americans and a different one for Philippines at the church (Ascension Catholic Community1).

The Boy Scout movement however, seeks to develop the physical fitness and moral characters of young men in the congregation. Retirees also have their unique group through which they share ideas and life experiences. Female members of the congregation sponsor days of recollection and other social programs and events that benefit the community. The bereavement ministry helps families cope with death of loved ones while also supporting funeral arrangements. The church also collaborates with the community of hope to provide shelter to the impoverished families to build homes. The church also runs a scholarship fund for bright children and uses volunteers to steer most of its daily activities. This further exemplifies the kind and caring nature of most worshippers at the church. For instance, the transportation ministry transports the sick and elderly to church services and hospital visits (Ascension Catholic Community1).

Description of the church and significance of the symbols used

At the front of the church at the pulpit, there was the bible. However, my friend corrected me that the pulpit was actually known as a lectern and the lectionary as the Catholics refer to it contains parts of the Bible that the father uses to conduct mass. There were different statues in different positions within the church. These statues represented different saints. Moreover, the saints, believed to be in heaven overlook upon the faithful and guide them in their daily lives. For one to become a saint, they have to live exemplary lives while on earth and present good examples to others. There was also a statue of Mary holding her baby, Jesus Christ (Ascension Catholic Community1).

In front of the statue, there were lit candles that are a symbol of prayer. I also noticed 14 pictures all round the walls of the church. These Stations of the Cross tell the story of the suffering and eventual death of Jesus at the hand of Romans. These stations guide Catholic faithful in prayer during the lent period that precedes the Easter festival. At the front of the church, hanging from above there was a cross with a figure on it. This crucifix I was informed represented Jesus crucification on the cross. Some faithful bowed to the crucifix as they entered the church as a sign of respect and adoration for Jesus (Ascension Catholic Community1).

At the middle front of the church, an altar covered in cloth with candles around it is the main figure. On the left of the altar, there is a baptismal font where baptismal rites take place on occasional basis. In addition, there was a cabinet containing three vessels of oil. One is for blessing and strengthening those preparing for Baptism, another for the sick and the third is used in giving sacraments to the faithful. The tabernacle is used to keep holy Eucharist used in communion. The lamp hanging above this small place further represents Jesus presence in inside the special house. Therefore, the catholic take the tabernacle to be the holiest place in the church. The Pascal candle is a symbol of Jesus resurrection and is therefore replaced every Easter. Finally, the canopy hanging above the altar represents the time Jewish were wandering in the desert. Moreover, the canopy serves to remind Catholics of their journey with the Lord (Ascension Catholic Community1).

The actual service and its significance

We all stood up as an introductory song was sung as the priest and ministers entered and proceeded to the altar. The purpose of this opening song was to deepen our unity as the Mass began. After a greeting from the Father in form of a short prayer, we went back to our seats. A group confession of sins followed by singing a hymn before the Father closed the first session with an opening prayer that concludes the introductory rites to every mass(Ascension Catholic Community1).

In the liturgy, we celebrated God’s word by listening to his message from the Bible. This celebration is essential to deepen our faith and thank God for the gift of life. A first reading came from the Old Testament to embrace the role of Jesus as a link between the past and present. This was concluded with a reflective psalm that also created an atmosphere of prayer. The second reading came from the book of Mathews to motivate us in facing the challenges of the modern world. The reading reflected our current challenge of electing a new president in the coming weeks and encouraged us to have faith in God’s guidance to make the correct choice (Ascension Catholic Community1).

A gospel reading from the book of John formed the gospel reading for the Sunday and marked the climax of the liturgy of the word. The sermon taught us that by proclaiming the gospel, we welcome Christ amongst us. Listening to the Gospel proclaimed further reminded us and identified us with the first faithful who heard these teachings from Jesus himself. At the end of the reading, the father proclaimed the gospel of the lord to which we affirmed. After reciting the Apostles Creed, individuals presented their own prayers to the Lord from the altar (Ascension Catholic Community1).

Worshippers then proceeded to give their offerings through a collection basket that went around. All types of gifts were also presented to the altar from a procession that included children. The father blessed these gifts and asked Jesus to accept them on our behalf.

The father later conducted a different thanksgiving prayer requesting the Lord through his Holy Spirit to transform the gifts into his body and blood. This epiclesis recalled the last supper when Jesus shared the last meal with his disciples before his eventual betrayal. In a moment of silence, the church remembered the sacrifice of Jesus (Ascension Catholic Community1).

The short meditation is crucial to keep his memory by believing in his death, resurrection, and eventual ascension. This memorial further challenges Christians to be ready to make sacrifices as Jesus did while remembering all those who have passed on. Afterwards, church attendants proceed to partake of the holy sacrament that represents Christ’s body while the wine represents his blood that he spilt to save humanity. Public announcements followed before the priest concluded the service (Ascension Catholic Community1).

My experience

The service was generally enjoyable except for some of the prayers that I was not accustomed to reciting. The visit was a revelation and I learnt many aspects of the Catholic Church. This has consequently changed my perception on Catholics and the presence of statues in their church. I fully understand the symbolism of these and fully appreciate their beliefs. Furthermore, the priest was lively and used real life experiences in relating the sermon to our daily life experiences. I also found the choir extremely wonderful by the hymns they sung and the dancing by little children from the Sunday school. Moreover, the congregation was friendly and very hospitable to visitors (Ascension Catholic Community1).

What needs to be improved

The church should expand the sitting capacity to accommodate more faithful. I noticed some worshippers stranded outside because of the limited seats available. The parking lot should also be expanded to accommodate more worshippers’ cars. However, these seem not to hinder the congregation visiting the church since all masses are always full (Ascension Catholic Community1).

Conclusion

I really enjoyed my visit to Ascension Catholic Church. Apart from the spiritual nourishment, I gained valuable insight into Catholic history and beliefs. My interaction with the friendly congregation further encouraged me to make regular visits to the church. Finally, I might just make more visits to the church in future to build on this new learning and spiritual experience. This will enable me to break the routine monotony from my church occasionally.

Work cited

Ascension Catholic Community, 2012. Web. 15th October 2012.

Religion Is Incompatible With Modernity Theology Religion Essay

As a cultural condition, modernity colors religions perception in various ways. Popular modernization theorists such as Daniel Bell and Karl Marx have asserted that the result of economic development is persistent cultural changes. However, other scholars such as Samuel Huntington and Max Weber have argued that cultural values are an autonomous and enduring influence on society. Religion, which is the broad cultural heritage of society, leaves an imprint on values, which endure in spite of modernization. This paper presents a discussion the impact of religion on modernity.

Discussion

What is modernity? A traditional meaning of this term refers to the social conditions that resulted from the rise of industrialization. Certainly, the term modernity is normally used to describe the social patterns that accompanied the Industrial Revolution, which commenced in mid-eighteenth century in Western Europe. Therefore, modernity is the process of urbanizing, industrialization, increasing use of new and scientific technologies, and social, cultural and political changes, which have accompanied these developments. Though popular scholars such as Marx and Bell predicted the decline of religion because of modernity, it is important to note that religion or spirituality has not faded.

In the twentieth century, modernization was broadly viewed as distinctively Western processes, which societies in non-Western countries could follow as they deserted their conventional cultures, and incorporated ethically aa‚¬E?superioraa‚¬a„? and technologically Western ways. However, in the second half of the twentieth century, non-Western societies surprisingly surpassed their Western role models in significant elements of modernization (Dawkins, 2006 pp. 167). For instance, East Asia achieved the highest rate of economic growth in the world. Japan led in consumer electronics and automobile manufacturing, and had the highest life expectancy globally. Presently, few scholars would attribute ethical superiority to the West, and economies of Western countries are no longer believed to be the model for the globe.

With regard to secularization, secular simply means without religion. Individuals who are non-religious live secular lives. Secular government runs along humanistic and rational lines. In democratic nations, this is the norm. People, who make up the government, have the freedom to whatever religion they want, as is the population. In a multi cultural world, because of this freedom, there is a requirement for authorities not to cause divisions by identifying itself with a certain religion. Secularism is the belief that religion should be a personal, private, and voluntary affair, which does not impose on others. Thus, secularization is the process of things becoming more secular. The Western world has witnessed this standard come to dominate civil and political life. Because religion causes issues, it retreats from the public sphere because individuals choose to meet in peace in neutral terms. Secularization theory is a sociology theory that argues that religion retreats when the society advances in modernity. Scientific and intellectual developments have undermined the supernatural, paranormal, spiritual and superstitious ideas on which religion relies for its authenticity. There are three forms of secularization: privatization of religion, social differentiation, and the decline of religion.

According to secularization theory, as contemporary society advances, it will become more secular and religion will in turn become hollow. Ever since the emergence of science in the seventeenth century, scholars have asserted that religion might be in a permanent decline, while others have proposed to intelligence and science are anathema to spirituality or religious faith. Bruce (1992 pp. 78) asserts that though contemporary church membership is dropping, religious belief is still strong.

One aspect of conventional secularization theory is that one widely questioned fact among modern religion sociologists is the claim that modernity leads to the decline of religion. Rather than withering away, organized religion has a large presence in many parts of the modern world (Thompson, 1992 pp. 148). Whereas participation in churches has sharply fallen in many modern societies in Europe, the picture is still complicated. In the 90s eighty one percent of the British, and forty percent of Italians attended church at least once a week. In the U.S, a modern society, approximately forty percent attend church on a regular basis. Secularists have tried hard to explain this theory.

Is Secularization occurring in Britain? If being a secular nation means keeping religion out of education and public life, then it is evident that Britain is not a secular nation. The Church of England, which can be dated from the seventh century, predates Britain itself. Although the influence of Christianity in formal ways in public life is less that it previously was, it is still apparent. The presence of prayers in the English Parliament, church legislation passed by parliament, exercise of patronage by the Lord Chancellor reveals that religion is still very much tangled in British national life. This demonstrates that the Christian religion is largely part of British national life.

The afro mentioned can also be observed at the local level. Secularism is just not about removing religion from national life. It is rather about removing it from public life (Ruthven 2004 pp. 167). Numerous Anglican churches still hold countless civic services and in some places, they are actively involved in local life, for example when selecting Bishops and so on. This reveals the observation of many people involved in the selection process, which the Bishop does and should play a notable role in symbolizing the Church in public matters.

Another notable area where Britain shows that it is not a secular state is in education. Almost all of the primary schools in Britain are Church of England schools. In addition to this, the high number of public schools has Christian foundations. Latest statistics reveal that at least seventy two percent of the British refer themselves as Christians. That is almost three-quarters of the overall British population. But, these statistics do not prove much, it is possible to have a country where all of its population is of one religion, but the state is secular. Because the Christian religion is deeply entangled in national life in Britain, the statistics are quite relevant. However, it should be noted that relatively few people in Britain have altogether opted out of religion; atheists are rare. Additionally, although it has been observed that there can be little doubt about trends, Beyer (1994 pp. 104), asserts that by the twenty first century, believers in religion are highly likely to be only found in small numbers likely resisting global secular culture.

The U.S is a secular country both in its government and most of its private sector. The population in the United States is still mostly Christian, yet by any ballpark figure, secular Americans make up a larger section of the public than any religious minority. Still, secularists do not start to exert influence exerted by religious institutional; whether they represent large Christian denominations or small minorities such as Judaism. In the United States, the reason as to why secular groups have little influence in states governed by Christian fundamentalists is scientifically clear, but the issue of why secularists are mostly ignored by the President is more complicated.

The United States demonstrates that the impact of religion on national life is simply not one of formal engagement. The customs and laws of countries are not draw from a vacuum due to the fact that law makers are individuals themselves and thus, normally reveal the values of those around them. When the individuals of a country have been severely shaped by a certain religion, the values of that particular religion will in general, be echoed in the national life. In the United States, the influence of Christianity has been felt in spite of the contrasting degrees of separation of the state and the church. However, to a large extent, this situation is changing. There is an increasing observation that Christian ethics are been abandoned. In this context, Christians will wish to influence the life of the country and those around them. In Britain, this appears to be largely accepted due to the nature of the Church to the state. On the other hand, in the United States, a region where Christians are more in numbers and actually more aggressive, the opposition of their views is not on certain issues, but on the very notion of Christians influencing national life with secularists disputing that it is unconstitutional (Bruce, 1992 pp. 137).

Also, no secular institution can affect the lives of its sympathizers and members to the scale that churches can. This is somewhat about the social pressure and partly about money, which binds church members together as a population. No secular group can claim special authority in attempting to convincing secular Americans to support a certain position.

However, during trying times, such as during the terrorist attacks of 9/11, there is strong religious unity. For example, immediately after this attack, shocked political enemies gathered together for prayer at a National Cathedral, including a Muslim imam who even read verses from the Koran. But, it did not take long for the tender feelings of tolerance and togetherness to be replaced by hostility and division. Some policymakers and leaders embraced Samuel Huntingtonaa‚¬a„?s argument that the West was busy in a clash of civilizations with Islam (Gray, 2003 pp. 289). On the other hand, secularists embraced the idea that the world was split between dangerous religionists and secularists. Secular scholars have hoped and predicted for years that as our societies become more advanced, religion would become less significant.

However, while the last decade has inspired countless challenging discussions about the link between democratic societies and religious communities, it has also proven that religion decline is not inevitable in modern society. Trust in religious leaders and institutions as well as secular institutions have declined. However, Americans still continue to value religion with about eighty percent telling pollsters that religion is a significant part of their lives. And the relocation of religious immigrants to America and Britain has shown that Western societies are by no means a civilization in which religion is imperceptible.

What is more, many conflicts are occurring in modern societies over religion: banning of hijab in French schools, debates over teaching evolution in schools, and so on. Nevertheless, when focusing on such conflicts, we normally miss a fascinating fact. In the face of modernity, old religious traditions are not fading away. Instead, they are acclimatizing and forcing modern societies to adapt to them.

According to the conventional view, major universal features of modernity tend to wear away religious faith. Rationalization and industrialization have often been mentioned as forces that would divide the world. However, it is not evident that churches and other religious institutions can thrive in highly rationalized and industrialized societies. At times, urbanization coincides with the decline of religion, but it is regularly linked with church growth, and in various parts of the globe, the megacity has generated the mega church (Beyer, 1994 pp. 87). Another major element that corrodes religious faith is mass entertainment. No country has a lot of mass entertainment than the U.S; however, it does not seem to have led to any clear decline in church attendance. Just like in Britain, Sunday in the United States has become a day to watch football or shopping day. In the U.S, the great secular holiday is the Super Bowl Sunday. There are also other indications. Many Americans prefer to get buried or married without any kind of religious ceremony. At education institutions, such as universities, departments dedicated to the study of secularism are starting to be established. Books written by authors who are atheists are bestsellers. And there is still little uncertainty that religious groups still wield a lot of influence in American public life and politics, particularly in major parties.

Another element of modernity that seems to corrode religion is the pluralism of modern societies. Sociologists have regularly argued that pluralism corrodes religion; the existence of so many religions challenges the plausibility of religious faith. However, pluralistic societies contain numerous people with strong religious belief. But, we all know that pluralistic societies contain numerous people with strong religious beliefs and if this was not false, then pluralistic societies could not exist. According to a recent study, evangelicalism in America positively thrives on pluralism due to the fact that living in a pluralistic society causes evangelicals to sharpen their different religious identities.

Norris & Ingle-hart (2004, pp. 245) asserts that post-modernity with its expressive consumerism and individualism, challenges tradition religion. Some types of religion appear to blossom in a post-modern environment. This is most noticeably true in Pentecostal and charismatic forms of evangelicalism that strike in with easy-to-read individualism of post-modernity. Still, there is no strong evidence that science is a key agent of secularization. According to a 1996 survey, roughly forty percent Americans believe in a personal god. Science is not a secularizing force. But, a factor that appears to closely correlate with secularization is the western style higher education. Though Americans are known for their religiosity, there is compelling evidence that social elites are rather highly secularized. Still, in the United States and Western Europe, individuals with a higher education are more likely to be keenly involved in churches than people with little education (Cohen & Kennedy, 2000 pp. 154).

It is notable that none of modernityaa‚¬a„?s universal features can explain the reason why some areas of the modern world are more highly secularized than other areas. The effect of these features is dependent on the particular context that they operate. Additionally, global factors are poor predictors of secularization, and religious decline can only be explained with reference to independent variables present in societies that are highly secularized. Beyer (1994 pp. 178) asserts that modernization essentially leads to a decline of religion, in the minds of people and in society.

Conclusion

When evaluating the role of religion in modern societies, it is crucial to address secularization. There is a lot of pressure exerted to make Britain a more secular nation. However, Britain retains a strong Christian basis in education and public life. On the other hand, the population in the United States is still mostly Christian, but secular Americans constitute a larger segment of the public than any other religious minority.

Religion In Life Of Pi Theology Religion Essay

If you stumble about believability, what are you living for. Love is hard to believe, ask any lover. Life is hard to believe, ask any scientist. God is hard to believe, ask any believer. What is your problem with hard to believe.

Life of Pi is a tale about survival, belief in God and coming of age that unfolds while the protagonist is floating in a lifeboat on the Pacific Ocean. Belief in God is clearly a major theme in this novel, and has been the most controversial in reviews of the book. Throughout the novel, Pi makes his belief in and love of God clear. This exhilarating story begins with an old man in Pondicherry who tells the narrator, “I have a story that will make you believe in God.” The protagonist explores the different issues of religion and spirituality from an early age and survives even 227 days shipwrecked in the ocean. Storytelling and religious beliefs are two closely linked ideas in the novel. On a literal level, each of Pi’s three religions, Hinduism, Christianity, and Islam, come with its own set of tales and fables, which are used to spread the teachings and illustrate the beliefs of the faith. This book defends not only the common spirit behind these three religions, but the rituals and ceremonies of each. It’s as if all three religions find harmonious common ground in this character. Seems unlikely, but then again, the protagonist argues passionately that the miraculous happens in our darkest moments. These three religions are really all the same except for small differences in the practice of their faith. Hindus have a great capacity for love; Muslims see God in everything; and Christians are quite devout. In this case, Pi enjoys the wealth of stories, but he also senses that, as Father Martin assured him was true of Christianity, each of these stories might simply be aspects of a greater, universal story about love.

Pi remains unattached to any one interpretation of God. Sure, he believes each religion – but he doesn’t guard their specific tenets jealously. Pi shares a rich parable: Each time the milkmaids try to possess Krishna he vanishes. Likewise, each time a religious faith tries to claim sole ownership of God, true religion vanishes. This story reveals a few of the workings of Pi’s complex religious beliefs. You may have wondered how anyone could ever hold Hindu, Christian, and Muslim beliefs all at once. Pi’s answer: without a trace of jealousy.

Stories and religious beliefs are also linked in Life of Pi because Pi asserts that both require faith on the part of the listener or devotee. Surprisingly for such a religious boy, Pi admires atheists. To him, the important thing is to believe in something, and Pi can appreciate an atheist’s ability to believe in the absence of God with no concrete proof of that absence. Pi has nothing but disdain, however, for agnostics, who claim that it is impossible to know either way, and, who therefore refrain from making a definitive statement on the question of God. So Pi sees that this as an evidence of a shameful lack of imagination. To him, agnostics who cannot make a leap of faith in either direction are like listeners who cannot appreciate the non-literal truth a fictional story might provide.

Regarding with the plot of this novel, we begin with a little boy, Pi Patel, who is the main character of Yann Martel’s novel Life of Pi. He’s the son of a zookeeper who runs a small zoo in India. Despite all his family’s ideas of modern secularism, Pi is drawn to religion. In his adolescence he adopts not only the beliefs of Hinduism, but Catholicism and Islam as well. Each religion gives Pi something that he felt was missing in his spiritual life so, because of this, he never feels compelled to choose one belief system over the other. “Religion will save us,” I said. Since when I could remember, religions had always been close to my heart”. So, in this case and because of his family, he was first introduced to Hinduism and describes it as the religion of his birth and a deep part of himself. For him, Hinduism is not a religion to be left behind when he discovers another, but rather the intrinsic framework of his own spirituality. Then, when he finds out Catholicism, he studies it through curiosity for what it entails, not because of any dissatisfaction with his current understanding of Hinduism, largely for his own pleasure. The same is true at the time that he later adds the religion of Islam to his quilt of religious beliefs. While the young boy is comfortable with his firm and serious belief in three seemingly disparate religions, the leaders of these religions are obviously not so happy when they learn of his expanded view of religion. As chance would have it, Pi’s priest, pandit and imam all happen upon Pi and his parents at the same time. This ensuing conversation captures current religious discord as all of the religious leaders agree that Pi cannot be Hindu, Catholic, and Muslim at the same time and despite their prodding, Pi insists that he simply wants to love and adore God. He says: “I just want to love God” (Martel 69) and will not choose between religions.

Then, during his adolescence, he also discovers atheism through his biology teacher, Mr. Kumar. Though Pi greatly respects Mr. Kumar, and calls him his favourite teacher, Pi isn’t comfortable exploring all the ideas of atheism or seeing how science holds its own beauty without need for a deity. He decides that atheists are his “brothers and sisters of a different faith”, but it is not a belief that he understands or chooses to explore. In fact, the concept of atheism frightens him so much. Pi, who asks many questions when he is presented with other religions, is very silent when Mr. Kumar always offers some of his atheistic views: “Religion?” Mr. Kumar grinned broadly. “I don’t believe in religion. Religion is darkness.” Pi answers: Darkness? I was puzzled. I thought, Darkness is the last thing that religion is. Religion is light. Was he testing me? Was he saying, “Religion is darkness,” the way he sometimes said in class things like “Mammals lay eggs,” to see if someone would correct him? (“Only platypuses, sir.”)(1.7.9 – 11) and finally explains: “It wasn’t for fear of angering Mr. Kumar. I was more afraid that in a few words thrown out he might destroy something that I loved.” Pi’s education includes both science and religion; he comes to love both these disciplines but agnosticism – the suspension of belief (e.g., “I don’t have enough evidence to believe in God so I won’t commit one way or the other.”) – drives the boy bonkers. For Pi, belief is one of the most beautiful actions of human life. To live otherwise is to live statically. One can either choose a rich, dynamic life or a static, uncommitted life. Yet, this religious discussion takes place well before Pi is set adrift in a lifeboat filled with wild zoo animals. Here it is the groundwork that shapes the rest of the story, a wonderful and incredible story that is only and exclusively meant to make listeners believe in god. Part two of the book begins the tale of Pi’s shipwreck and subsequent survival.

When Pi is 16, his family decides to sell the zoo and immigrate to Canada to escape the increasingly undesirable political developments in 1970’s India. They will get a better price for many of their animals in America, so the family and several of the animals of the zoo begin their journey on a Japanese cargo ship named Tsimtsum. “Midway to Midway” the ship suddenly and quickly sinks for unknown reasons. When this unfortunate event takes place, Pi finds himself in a lifeboat with a hyena, an orangutan, a wounded zebra, and an adult Bengal tiger. There are no other human survivors, and it is not long before the animals do away with each other-the hyena dispatches the zebra and the orangutan and the tiger dispatch the hyena-, leaving Pi and the tiger alone in the lifeboat.

In the same way, we can clearly assert that Pi Patel wins lots of different challenges covering from his psychic and spiritual learning to his basic and essential instinct and survival throughout his horrific and very hard adventures at sea. The most relevant fact is that his unbelievable believing in God, helps him to survive multiple obstacles that he faces on the lifeboat. His study about all three religions, serves as a great defensive safeguard from the difficult harsh situations of life. It is a very long journey filled with too much danger, loneliness and doubt, but most of all an exploration of faith. This astonishing character maintains all his religious beliefs while on the life boat through his daily ritual prayers, which helps to sustain him. He’s faced with physical difficulty almost all time, ranging from salt-water boils, to the threat of death by a tiger, to cold, to starvation, to dehydration, to dementia and many other difficulties. He continues to pray regularly, and must plead to God in order to survive his ordeal. He remembers the misery he felt after such a long time away from God, saying: “It was natural that, bereft and desperate as I was, in the throes of unremitting suffering, I should turn to God” (Martel 315). With Pi keeping his ritual prayers going, that helped him to survive. Also, he was able to maintain somewhat the religious lifestyle that he had prior to the sinking of the Tsimtsum. He also makes many religious relationships throughout his journey and lots of comparisons between Orange Juice and the Virgin Mary. “She came floating on an island of bananas in a halo of light, as lovely as the Virgin Mary” (Martel 111). Truly, Pi’s religious faith remained strong throughout his journey on the Pacific Ocean.

Straightway, when Pi eventually washes up on the shores of Mexico, and the tiger dashes off into the jungle never to be seen again, he is nursed back to health by locals. While Pi is recovering, two men from the company that owned the Japanese cargo ship come to visit him. They are very anxious because they are looking for answers about what might have caused the ship to sink so then he tells them the fantastic and amazing tale that he experienced and was presented through the book. Obviously, the men do not believe him so they became very upset and tell Pi that they want to know what really happened. They only want to know a rational truth. After some discussion, Pi agrees to tell them another story, another one that does not involve animals or any marvellous fact. His second boring story involves a handful of human survivors, including one who kills the others, even including Pi’s mother. He affirms that at the end of the story he kills the killer and is left as the only survivor. Neither story sheds any light on why the ship might have sunk. Before the men leave, Pi asks him about which of the two stories is the best, since neither provides factual information that they can use. The men who appears at the beginning, who was listening the whole story, agree that the story with the animals was a better story. This is the point of the book. It is the reason why readers are supposed to now believe in god. When it comes down to a choice between realism and fantasy, or science and religion, which story is the best?

Religious minded readers may find comfort in the notion that it is better to believe in an uplifting story over more believable, but less entertaining facts. However, this argument is unlikely to be persuasive to atheists or encourage them to believe in God.

Religion And Drug Use Theology Religion Essay

Since the early 80s, a body of research has surfaced focusing on the relationship between religion and drug use. This literature states that there was a negative relationship between religion and drug use. The history of drug use is entangled with religion and societal views on these behaviors often have their roots in spiritual or religious perspective. In Jewish and Christian scriptures, for example, the drinking of wine is assumed to be part of ordinary life, and its virtues are even adorned.

The central sacramental observance in both Judaism and Christianity involve the use of wine. Other religions have assigned sacred uses to other drugs as well, including tobacco and hallucinogens, such as peyote. On the other hand, many religions, such as Islam, strictly prohibit the use of alcohol drinks or other drugs, and other religious groups strongly advise against their use. Religion has also impacted our views of the problems associated with alcohol and drug abuse. Although Judeo-Christian culture approve of light to moderate alcohol use, there is a clear and consistence biblical condemnation of drunkenness, the use of alcohol in a manner that cause impairment or harm. This is abuse of alcohol that is often denounced by religious teachings as sinful. Use of drugs that inflict harm or increase the possibility of harm to oneself or others is also placed in this category. Given these longstanding connections between religion and substance use, and the important roles of religious and spiritual perspective in shaping our moral understanding of addiction, researchers have long been fascinated in the relationship between religion, and drug use problems in populations (Fuller 17-91).

Evidence that religion may directly influence substance use by serving as a moral compass comes primarily from studies that have looked at why people choose not to drink. Studies have been done to correlate attitude on drug use with several measures of religiousness, including affiliation, church attendance, degree of satisfaction derived from church activities, and the extent to which people considered themselves religious.

Since religion has been acclaimed to be a protective mechanism against drug use and dependence, many researchers have conducted their studies by linking this issue with the young adults in our society. This is so since they are the ones who are mostly affected by drug use. Their findings indicated that young people who are seriously committed in their religions are more likely to refrain from using drugs than those who are not. Why since they are students who tend to avoid peer influence or groups that may lead them to engage in this behavior, and engage in other activities that may be of advantage to them. It has been examined that students who perform well at school, and those who uphold on the idea of going to college are the ones who less likely use drugs and also have been known to more religious (Maggs455).

An understanding of how religion affects drug use has been hampered by lack of theoretical development. One of the major theoretical orientations used to examine religious drug use is social control theory. According to this perspective, individuals develop bonds to society that restrain them from using drugs through the following. First, individual become attached to a faith community and its members. Because of this attachment and the negative sanctions that may follow drug use, those who attend service are less expected to use drugs than those who do not. Second involvement in religious activities allows less time for drug experimentation. Involvement also may provide a network of support that insulates people from opportunities to use drugs.

Third, commitment to a religious organization and its goal provides existential meaning that makes drugs use less attractive. Fourth, the belief system of most religious groups opposes drug use and their teachings may reinforce personal beliefs against use. In short, religious organizations tend to involve people in conventional activities and social network that disapprove of illicit drug use. If, through Religious activities, individuals develop a network of friends who do not use drugs and whose attitudes are not tolerant of drug use, participation may reinforce attitudes against drug use. Even those who have friends who use drugs might refrain from the use if they receive high levels of counterbalancing definitions from religious teachings and activities. Both of these theories provide insights in to the process of how religion influences drug use. Social control theorist assumes that bonds to a religious organization and to others who are involved in the organization deter drug use.

Replacing health care with religion practice

In 1999 Haworth press published a journal the journal of religion and abuse. The issues stated that while membership in close religious groups may enhance social support for those who abide by prescription and proscription of the group, individuals who deviate from the accepted standard may be judged negatively and consequently be marginalized. If a religious person becomes ill members of his church pray for his healing if the person receives healing, the religious group affirms their beliefs. If no healing is received the person is often blamed for the sickness and it is always blamed on him.

Religious practices have been used to replace traditional health care as well as physical care. This is not surprising since there is such a great overlap between mental health and spiritual health, which is indistinguishable. Some religions have been known to prohibit their members from going to the hospital and also to from taking drugs. Believers of these religions claim miraculous cures where they seek help from faith healers, turning exclusively to religious activities instead of seeking timely medical attention.

Other religions have been known to treat their members with some drugs which are considered to be harmful to the human bodies thus endangering the lives of their members. For example a religious group in Mexico has been known to use tobacco for their rituals in their religious ceremony. This is where believers in this religion proclaiming that through usage of this substance one experience healing of the mind and the body but on the hand we know that tobacco is a drug (Hoyee 34-40).

Conclusion

With the studies done linking drug use and religion it has clearly established that religion plays an important role in curbing and influencing the drug usage in our society, most people have been known to refrain from the drug use due to religion teachings. On the other hand, we see also religion playing a big part in inducing drug use by its members. This is where some religions permitting their members to drink wine, smoke tobacco and indulge in other drug related practices which are harmful to the human body. In a way, we can say religion plays a big part in influencing people in every aspect of our lives.

Work cited

Ng, Ho-yee. From Coffin to Heaven: A Psychological Study of Christian Conversion in Drug

Rehabilitation. Hong Kong: the Chinese university press, 2004. Print.34-40

Fuller, Robert C. Stairways to Heaven: Drugs in American Religious History. Boulder, Colo.

[u.a.: Westview Press, 2000. Print.17-91

Maggs, Jennifer, John Schulenberg, and Klaus Hurrelmann. Health Risks and Developmental

Transitions during Adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Print.455